
Are Black folks so thoroughly confused that when we have the first serious presidential candidate, we continue to be stuck with having to ask the silly – and yes, downright degrading – question over the blackness of the junior senator from Illinois, Barack Obama?
For the last six months we have seen a litany of intellectuals, columnists, pundits and radio talk show hosts decipher this issue, as if it is really a relevant one.
Oh, you think it’s relevant? How about this: I haven’t heard a single person ask if Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-N.Y.) is woman enough to run for president. You don’t find Catholics wasting precious airtime pontificating about the relevancy of former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani, even though his position in abortion and gays certainly runs counter to that of the church. And with all the white guys running, no one white is asking if they are white enough for the White House.
This is dumb. No, it’s insulting.
And it’s time that Black America grew up.
For years we have heard our parents preach and preach about the need to stay focused on getting a good education and going to a good school. So we’ve seen a generation of African Americans head to the Ivy League institutions; the state schools that fought to keep us out; and the private schools that refused to admit us, even if some had the money.
Then we were told not to settle for what was given. So, an increasing number of Blacks ran for citywide and countywide positions. Others chose to go even higher and run for statewide office. In the case of L. Douglas Wilder, he became the first African American elected to the governor’s mansion in Virginia. Last year, we saw Deval Patrick, a Harvard-educated PK – project kid! – from the South Side of Chicago be sworn in as governor of Massachusetts.
Since Reconstruction, we’ve seen three African Americans join the U.S. Senate: Edward Brooke, a Republican from Massachusetts in 1966; Carol Moseley Braun, an Illinois Democrat in 1992; and Obama in 2004.
Now, years after seeing blacks like the late Rep. Shirley Chisholm, Rev. Jesse Jackson Sr., Braun and Rev. Al Sharpton (OK, for racial sake, I’ll mention Alan Keyes’ run for the White House) run largely symbolic campaigns – Rev. Jackson did get 7 million votes in 1988 but only 8 percent of the delegates – Obama’s candidacy has legs, and more importantly money.
I knew this would be an issue, so in February, I ran a front page story in the Chicago Defender asking this very question. That was followed up by a three-part series using my syndicated column to lay out the foolishness of the question.
Enough is enough.
There is no litmus test to determine if you are an African American. If you disagree with the policies of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas – and I surely do – he is still a black man. Condoleezza Rice may be in lockstep with President George W. Bush, but the first Black female secretary of state is a Black woman. And yes, Obama may be speaking to mostly white audiences on the campaign trail, but when that U.S. Census form comes to his home, he checks the black box.
So why don’t we accept the reality that he can’t win the presidency by being contained to our black box. He can have an agenda that includes black folks, but he can’t win on a black agenda. You know, so stop trippin’. There is no Black White House. He’s not running for president of Black America. He is seeking the highest office in the land: The U.S. president. The commander-in-chief. The head man (or if Clinton wins, woman) in charge.
Trust me, if he wins, these same idiots who question his blackness will be doing their best to suck up to him, calling him “Brother Obama,” as if they always saw him as one of their own.
Roland S. Martin is a CNN contributor and a talk show host for WVON-AM in Chicago. You can hear “The Roland S. Martin Show” from 6 am to 9 am CST daily at www.wvon.com. You can also catch Roland Martin’s Perspective daily on TV One Cable Network; and his columns are syndicated weekly by Creators Syndicate.