« December 2007 | Main | February 2008 »

January 2008

-->

January 31, 2008

Obama raises $32 million in January

Yea. That's no lie. There are 31 days in the month of January and Sen. Barack Obama raked in $1 million a day.

And some change.

All eyes popped open today when that figure was released. Coming off his win in Iowa; close loss in New Hampshire; close delegate win in Nevada - Clinton won the caucus; and win in South Carolina, the junior senator from Illinois is shaping up to have a ton of dough ready to do battle on Tuesday when voters in 22 states go to the polls.

January 30, 2008

And then there were two: John Edwards drops out

He opened his fledgling campaign in the Lower Ninth Ward in New Orleans. And today, former Sen. John Edwards returned their to end his spirited, but unsuccessful second run for the White House.

Standing in front of the Musicians Village, with his wife at his side, Edwards told those gathered that he is suspending his campaign, and has received pledges from Obama and Clinton to make poverty a top priority of their White House if elected.

He did not say that he was endorsing anyone today, but he will likely stay in the game by backing someone.

I keep getting the question if Edwards running out helps Clinton or Obama.

Frankly, it depends.

Based on the vote in South Carolina, and somewhat the so-called Democratic primary in Florida, Clinton is cleaning Obama's clock among white voters. This will be critical on Tuesday because 22 states are in play. And most of those are not southern states where you have significant black population.

Edwards also focused on low-income voters, and that's in the wheelhouse of Clinton. She will zero in on them, and tailor a message to pick up that support. Edwards also had union support, and they may tip towards Clinton.

Edwards was also a big critic of inside Washington politicians, and that's absolutely about Clinton. Obama needs to reach out to those individuals in order to grow his base.

At the end of the day, both candidates will be making a full court press for as many voters as possible.

Edwards now out of the race sets up a classic battle tomorrow between the top two candidates. This is a showdown, pure and simple.

Question of the Day: Will John Edwards' withdrawal help Clinton or Obama?

Giuliani's arrogance cost him the GOP nomination

SIMI VALLEY, Calif. - Imagine the New England Patriots' head coach, Bill Bellicheck, resting all of his starters on Sunday, see them fall way behind to the New York Giants, and then sends Tom Brady and the crew out in the fourth quarter and tells them, "Now go and win the game."

Yea, right.

That's exactly what former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani did by bypassing the early states and then trying to get back in the game in Florida.

After coming in a distant third to Sen. John McCain and former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, Giuliani is expected to withdraw from the race today and back his buddy McCain.

He's going to make the announcement here at the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library, where I'm located today, participating in CNN's debate tonight (I'll be doing post-debate on AC360).

Part of Giuliani's defeat is because he's a pro-gay, anti-gun, pro-choice mayor, and that's a little hard to take for the values voters in the GOP.

But it's also due to his arrogance. He refused to run in the early states, skipping Iowa, New Hampshire, Michigan, Nevada and South Carolina, and banking his future on the state of Florida.

Sorry dude, ain't happening.

It's just dumb to think that you can let your competition run up the score and think you can comeback.

Game over. You lose. Now it's for Giuliani to go home.

January 29, 2008

Caroline Kennedy links her father, JFK, and Obama in new ad

Wow, that sure didn't take long!

Check out the new ad that the Obama camps says will run in New York City, Boston, Los Angeles, San Francisco and on national cable.

Click here to view.

Another female governor backs Obama - this time from Kansas

If you thought the race battle was hot in South Carolina, the gender battle is also a heated one in the Democratic primary.

Today, Sen. Barack Obama picked up a huge endorsement out of Kansas, when Gov. Kathleen Sebelius tossed her support to him. She follows Arizona Gov. Janet Napolitano, who is also backing Obama.

Here is an email from the Obama camp:

Remarks of Kansas Governor Kathleen Sebelius Endorsing Senator Barack Obama for President

El Dorado, KS – During an event at Butler Community College in El Dorado, KS, Governor Kathleen Sebelius today endorsed Barack Obama for President. 

As Prepared for Delivery:

Endorsement of Barack Obama for President
Remarks Prepared for Delivery
By Kansas Governor Kathleen Sebelius
Tuesday, January 29, 2008

I’m pleased to welcome Senator Barack Obama to El Dorado today - the town where his grandparents were born, raised, and spent their years.

And, I am especially pleased to announce my enthusiastic endorsement of Senator Barack Obama for President of the United States - because Barack Obama represents exactly the kind of change Kansans can believe in.

His candidacy offers the heartland values instilled by his mother and grandparents - all three native Kansans.  Values of believing in something greater than ourselves, finding common sense solutions to problems, knowing that education is the doorway to opportunity, and working for the common good.

Senator Obama demonstrates a unique ability to reach across party lines - a quality we need now, right now, to unite our leaders and meet the serious challenges our country faces at home and abroad. 

We are now in the process of choosing a Democratic nominee, yes; but, even more importantly to me, and to this country, we are choosing a leader for America.

And, on an especially personal note - I admire the way Senator Obama has inspired a younger generation of Americans, my own children included.

For months now, my two sons have implored me to make my admiration for Senator Obama public.  To offer him my endorsement, and join this fight for change all of us can believe in.  I am proud to do so today.  Life at home will be easier for me after today, Barack, I assure you!

In all seriousness, though: I have long been concerned that America might “lose” a generation of its young to their disinterest in a politics that often seems stale and tired.  But Barack Obama has spoken to young Americans - like my two boys, Ned and John - and he has struck a chord.  They are listening.  Mobilizing.  Participating.  And our public life is so much better for it. 

Barack Obama knows these young Americans are not merely our future; they are our hope.  Our hope for a stronger America in the years ahead.

And Barack Obama knows this election, too, is about the future - not the past.  About changing our country.  And doing so under the leadership of Barack Obama - who represents the kind of change each of us can believe in.

As Senator Ted Kennedy said, "What counts in our leadership is not the length of years in Washington, but the reach of our vision, the strength of our beliefs, and that rare quality of mind and spirit that can call forth the best in our country and our people."

Here on Kansas Day we celebrate our state coming into the union, it's appropriate to welcome home Barack Obama. Our state motto, "As Astra Per Aspera" -- to the stars through difficulty --  is a great theme for this amazing journey. Even with difficult challenges ahead, this is the leadership we need to aim high and reach our potential.

It's great to welcome back to Kansas, the next President of the United States, Barack Obama!

Rep. Maxine Waters endorses Clinton

With so many states headed to the polls on Feb. 5, all the candidates are feverishly working to secure as many endorsements as possible.

Sen. Hillary Clinton picked up a coveted endorsement today when she secured the backing of California Congressman Maxine Waters, an influential member of the Congressional Black Caucus.

In a statement from the Clinton campaign, Waters said: “At a time when the economy continues to worsen and so many of my constituents are losing their homes and their jobs, we need someone with the leadership and experience who can step in on day one to tackle the economic challenges our country is facing,” said Congresswoman Waters. “The voices of so many struggling families have gone unheard for long enough. Hillary understands the daily challenges that people are facing and she will fight for them everyday she is in the White House.”
 
The support of the 18-year member of Congress is also considered important because her district is increasingly becoming Hispanic, which both candidates are feverishly courting in California.

“Maxine has spent a lifetime fighting for change and delivering results," Clinton said in the statement. "She has been a leader on all of the biggest challenges we face – from housing, to the economy, to Iraq and I’m so honored to have her support in this campaign,” said Senator Clinton. “Maxine is known and respected from the grassroots to the world stage as a voice for justice, for opportunity, and for peace and I am honored to have her support.”

Michigan, Florida must accept blame for having no delegates

I made my position clear earlier that I’m not a fan of our current system of allowing Iowa and New Hampshire dominate the early voting process for president.

As a result, a ton of state officials lost their minds and orchestrated this stampede of moving up their primaries in order “to be heard.” Based on previous elections, the general consensus was that we would have a nominee after the Feb. 5 “Super Tuesday,” so if you were holding a vote after, you’re screwed.

So, legislators in Michigan and Florida decided to put pressure on the two political parties and voted to move their date up, and both governors signed it into law. In Florida, it was a Republican-led effort, which Democrats silent, but pleased at the changes. In Michigan, Democrats took the lead, and the GOP was in agreement.

But the political parties said, in the words of Whitney Houston, “Hell to the no!” As a result, the Dems stripped Michigan of all delegates; the GOP took half.

Now folks in both states are hot and bothered, and they have an advocate in Sen. Hillary Clinton, who now says she wants their delegates seated at the convention in Denver.

Never mind the fact that their predicament was by their own doing. In fact, with the race on both sides being all over the place, had Florida and Michigan stayed put, they would have MORE power in deciding the nominee.

So folks in Michigan and Florida, blame yourself for your woes. YOUR elected representatives approved the changes. YOUR governors signed the bill into law, so if you are looking to assign blame, don’t look to the Democratic and Republican National Committees.

Look in the mirror.

Sharpton to Bill Clinton: 'Shut up!'

Hillary, oh, Hillary, where art thou?

For a moment there, I really did forget that the name, “Sen. Hillary Clinton,” was on the ballot in South Carolina. I thought that I missed the biggest story of the century when Congress changed the U.S. Constitution to allow a president to serve more than two terms!

I know former President Bill Clinton supports his wife, but he’s not the candidate. She is.

And as the one sitting at the top of the organizational chart, she’s the one in charge; the buck stops with her; and she need to assert herself and, in the words of South Carolina Congressman Jim Clyburn, tell her husband “to just chill out.”

What is so strong about Clinton is that she is as good a strategist as Karl Rove, also known as “the brain” of President George W. Bush. Coming out of Iowa, she knew that she had a major problem and immediately changed her strategy. She took more questions and tossed the stump speech; reached out to young voters; showed compassion; and in her own words, found her voice.

That “voice” continued to be strong in Nevada, which she also won. But then when South Carolina rolled around, it’s as if her voice left and Bill became the talker in the family.

And he talked. And talked. And talked. And talked. But it wasn’t her voice that left. She left!

She didn’t spend the entire week in South Carolina, and that meant her husband was the focus of the headlines.

Clinton can’t say on one hand that she’s the one running, and we keep hearing from him. Yesterday on ABC's "The View," even the Rev. Al Sharpton, who is NEVER quiet, told Bill to "shut up."

She does an amazing job in the debates of articulating her views. Sen. Clinton, your husband’s a great guy, but you’re the one running. You’re the one we have to make a choice about. America gave him two terms. If you don’t take your voice – and your campaign back – you may not get your own shot at the job.

Question of the Day: Is former President Bill Clinton usurping the campaign of Sen. Hillary Clinton, and should he step back?

January 28, 2008

Another black CEO bites the dust

With it's stock price in the tank, Sears Holding Corp. has announced that Aylwin B. Lewis will resign as CEO and president of the $55 billion-a-year company.

Lewis, 53, who was named CEO of Kmart in 2004, and when they merged with Sears, became CEO of the much larger company in 2005, was under considerable pressure to make it work.

It didn't.

He will also resign from the Sears board of directors, effective Feb. 2.

Read the story from Bloomberg.

Toni Morrison supports Obama

This was posted this morning on CNN.com

Morrison backs Obama
Posted: 10:00 AM ET

(CNN) – A decade ago, she called Bill Clinton the nation's "first black president." Now, acclaimed black writer Toni Morrison’s first presidential endorsement is going to the potential second, Barack Obama.

In a letter to Obama released Monday morning, the “Beloved” author told him she was backing him because “this is one of those singular moments that nations ignore at their peril.”

“There have been a few prescient leaders in our past, but you are the man for this time,” she wrote

Morrison, who said she had long admired Hillary Clinton, added that her decision to back Obama instead was not based on the Illinois senator’s race.

“In addition to keen intelligence, integrity and a rare authenticity, you exhibit something that has nothing to do with age, experience, race or gender and something I don't see in other candidates,” Morrison wrote. “That something is a creative imagination which coupled with brilliance equals wisdom. It is too bad if we associate it only with gray hair and old age.”

In a statement, Obama thanked Morrison for her endorsement, saying she “has touched a nation with the grace and beauty of her words, and I was deeply moved and honored by the letter she wrote and the support she is giving our campaign.”

In a 1998 New Yorker piece, Morrison wrote of Bill Clinton: “White skin notwithstanding, this is our first black president. Blacker than any actual black person who could ever be elected in our children's lifetime. After all, Clinton displays almost every trope of blackness: single-parent household, born poor, working-class, saxophone-playing, McDonald's-and-junk-food-loving boy from Arkansas.”

– CNN Associate Political Editor Rebecca Sinderbrand

Full Text of Letter To Senator Obama

Dear Senator Obama,

This letter represents a first for me--a public endorsement of a Presidential candidate. I feel driven to let you know why I am writing it. One reason is it may help gather other supporters; another is that this is one of those singular moments that nations ignore at their peril. I will not rehearse the multiple crises facing us, but of one thing I am certain: this opportunity for a national evolution (even revolution) will not come again soon, and I am convinced you are the person to capture it.

May I describe to you my thoughts?

I have admired Senator Clinton for years. Her knowledge always seemed to me exhaustive; her negotiation of politics expert.

However I am more compelled by the quality of mind (as far as I can measure it) of a candidate. I cared little for her gender as a source of my admiration, and the little I did care was based on the fact that no liberal woman has ever ruled in America. Only conservative or "new-centrist" ones are allowed into that realm. Nor do I care very much for your race[s]. I would not support you if that was all you had to offer or because it might make me "proud."

In thinking carefully about the strengths of the candidates, I stunned myself when I came to the following conclusion: that in addition to keen intelligence, integrity and a rare authenticity, you exhibit something that has nothing to do with age, experience, race or gender and something I don't see in other candidates. That something is a creative imagination which coupled with brilliance equals wisdom. It is too bad if we associate it only with gray hair and old age. Or if we call searing vision naivete. Or if we believe cunning is insight. Or if we settle for finessing cures tailored for each ravaged tree in the forest while ignoring the poisonous landscape that feeds and surrounds it. Wisdom is a gift; you can't train for it, inherit it, learn it in a class, or earn it in the workplace--that access can foster the acquisition of knowledge, but not wisdom.

When, I wondered, was the last time this country was guided by such a leader? Someone whose moral center was un-embargoed? Someone with courage instead of mere ambition? Someone who truly thinks of his country's citizens as "we," not "they"? Someone who understands what it will take to help America realize the virtues it fancies about itself, what it desperately needs to become in the world?

Our future is ripe, outrageously rich in its possibilities. Yet unleashing the glory of that future will require a difficult labor, and some may be so frightened of its birth they will refuse to abandon their nostalgia for the womb.

There have been a few prescient leaders in our past, but you are the man for this time.

Good luck to you and to us.

--Toni Morrison

Another Kennedy backs Clinton; Ted Kennedy for Obama

Recognizing the power of the daughter of President John F. Kennedy and his brother backing Sen. Barack Obama, the campaign of Sen. Hillary Clinton quickly tried to counter on Sunday with the endorsement of the oldest daughter of Robert F. Kennedy.

On Sunday, CNN learned that Massachusetts Sen. Edward Kennedy, the lone living brother of JFK and RFK, announced he was backing Obama over Clinton.

In a statement released by the Clinton campaign, Kathleen Kennedy Townsend, the former lieutenant governor of Maryland, said:

“I respect Caroline and Teddy's decision but I have made a different choice. While I admire Senator Obama greatly, I have known Hillary Clinton for over 25 years and have seen first hand how she gets results. As a woman, leader, and person of deep convictions, I believe Hillary Clinton would make the best possible choice for president. She shares so many of the concerns of my father. Hillary has spent a lifetime speaking out on behalf of the powerless and working to alleviate poverty, in our country and around the world.  I have seen her work up close and know she will be a great President. At this moment when so much is at stake at home and overseas, I urge our fellow Americans to support Hillary Clinton. That is why my brother Bobby, my sister Kerry, and I are supporting Hillary Clinton.”

Ted and Caroline Kennedy will both appear at a rally for Obama today in Washington, D.C.

January 27, 2008

Ruby Dee wins Screen Actors Guild award for 'American Gangster'

Ruby Dee, an accomplished actress who has mesmerized us all for 50 years, just won the Screen Actors Guild Award for Female Actor in a Best Supporting Role.

She is on her way to winning the Oscar!

Caroline Kennedy, daughter of JFK, endorses Obama

Caroline Kennedy, the lone living direct descendant of former President John F. Kennedy, endorsed Sen. Barack Obama in an op-ed in the New York Times.

This is what Obama had to say about her support: “I am honored to have the support of Caroline Kennedy.  Caroline has been a tireless advocate for providing every child with a quality education, most recently through her work with New York City’s public schools. And through her role in selecting Profile in Courage awardees, she has shined a spotlight on leaders who have the courage to tell people what they need to hear, not what they want to hear.  It’s also a special privilege to have this endorsement because I’ve always believed that Caroline’s father was one of our greatest presidents. At a time of great challenge at home and abroad, President Kennedy led this nation with judgment and courage, pulling the world back from the brink of war, calling a generation to service, and inspiring this entire nation to reach for new frontiers.”

Caroline Kennedy: A President Like My Father

from The New York Times

Over the years, I’ve been deeply moved by the people who’ve told me they wished they could feel inspired and hopeful about America the way people did when my father was president. This sense is even more profound today. That is why I am supporting a presidential candidate in the Democratic primaries, Barack Obama.

My reasons are patriotic, political and personal, and the three are intertwined. All my life, people have told me that my father changed their lives, that they got involved in public service or politics because he asked them to. And the generation he inspired has passed that spirit on to its children. I meet young people who were born long after John F. Kennedy was president, yet who ask me how to live out his ideals.

Read the full article.

January 26, 2008

Sen. Barack Obama's winning speech in South Carolina

Remarks of Senator Barack Obama from South Carolina on Jan. 26, 2008.

Statement from Sen. Clinton on her loss in South Carolina

Just got this email from the Clinton campaign after her loss to Sen. Barack Obama in South Carolina:

Statement from Hillary Clinton

“I have called Senator Obama to congratulate him and wish him well. “Thank you to the people of South Carolina who voted today and welcomed me into their homes over the last year. Your stories will stay with me well beyond this campaign and I am grateful for the support so many of you gave to me.

“We now turn our attention to the millions of Americans who will make their voices heard in Florida and the twenty-two states as well as American Samoa who will vote on February 5th.

“In the days ahead, I’ll work to give voice to those who are working harder than ever to be heard. For those who have lost their job or their home or their health care, I will focus on the solutions needed to move this country forward. That’s what this election is about. It’s about our country, our hopes and dreams. Our families and our future.”

CNN calls the South Carolina primary for Obama

The polls in South Carolina closed at 7 p.m. EST and barely at 7:01 p.m. EST, CNN calls the election for Sen. Barack Obama based on exit polling data.

Amsterdam News, Kimora Lee Simmons endorse Clinton

With Democrats voting in 22 states on Feb. 5, the endorsements of major newspapers will be coming in a flurry over the next few days.

The New York Times announced that Sen. Hillary Clinton was their choice on Thursday. And the next day, the Amsterdam News, New York's historic black newspaper, also is backing the home state senator.

It reads, in part:

"It has been difficult to make a decision as to who would be our Democratic nominee for President of the United States in 2008. We wish that we could say that it has been an easy task. It was not easy, but it was fair and it was the right thing to do."

Read the full endorsement here.

Also, model and entrepreneur Kimora Lee Simmons is offering up her support of Clinton.

In an email from the Clinton campaign, she says:

“I have known Hillary for many years and have seen her work passionately on many issues, including poverty, education, and prison reform.

“I'm proud to support Hillary because she has the experience necessary to deliver real solutions and turn our country around.  In addition, seeing Hillary as President would be an inspiration to my daughters, knowing that they too can be anything they want if they have the determination to make it happen. As a mother, I have learned that you must lead with your head, not just your heart, and I'm confident that Hillary will be the President to bring our country together and deliver a brighter future for all Americans.”

Her former - or it estranged or soon-to-be-ex? - Russell Simmons is also backing her. I caught them seated next to one another, and NY Congressman Charles Rangel at the Congressional Black Caucus in September.

January 25, 2008

Poll: Obama's white support down to 10% in South Carolina

The latest polling data suggests that Sen. Barack Obama is only garnering 10% of the white vote in South Carolina, with John Edwards at 40% and Sen. Hillary Clinton at 36%.

On CNN's The Situation Room, Contributor Carl Bernstein said the work of former President Bill Clinton appears to have paid off. He said it's obvious the Clintons played the race card to make Obama the "Black Candidate" - they deny that - but it had a serious effect on causing his white support to fall by 10 points in one week, which is pretty darn hard unless there is a major blunder.

The saving grace? About 14% of the white vote is undecided, so whoever captures the lion's share of that vote could be looking pretty on Saturday night.

Want an interesting read? Ron Fournier of the Associated Press pens a pretty good analysis: Hillary Wins Race on Race.

Also weighing in...Dick Morris, Bill Clinton's top strategist during his 1996 re-election bid. In "How Clinton will will the nomination by losing South Carolina" he says it boils down to race.

Wow, the Clinton promise not to attack didn't last long!

On yesterday, Sen. Hillary Clinton told me and Michael Baisden on his nationally syndicated radio show that she would end the attacks on Sen. Barack Obama if he stopped.

That was around 5 p.m. EST. Today at noon EST, the Clinton campaign held a conference call with reporters billed as: "Clinton campaign holds conference call today on Obama Campaign Attacks."

When we finally got started, it pretty much was a 30-minute call..attacking Obama!

One of the reporters even told those on the call that it was false billing, suggesting that the campaign was supposed to be responding to calls, but instead, continue to criticize him, namely about the comments about Ronald Reagan last week.

Among those on the line: Mike McCurry, former press secretary to President Bill Clinton; Rep. Kendrick Meek, D-Fla., member of Congressional Black Caucus; Mark Penn, top strategist and pollster for the Clinton campaign; Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass.; Mickey Kantor, chair of the Clinton-Gore campaign in 1992; and Phil Singer, a top communications aide.

I was hoping to actually get some insight into Clinton's campaign since she told me and Baisden that people should really focus on the issues, and that's it us in the media who should be doing so.

But no!!!!! It was all about how great the Clinton years were, and how he was such a visionary and a man of ideas. Meek even suggested that the Clintons got the ball started on the appointments of blacks and Hispanics to Cabinet positions, even though there have been minorities appointed going back to President Lyndon B. Johnson.

Frank spent a lot of time ripping Reagan; castigating him for slamming big government. Of course, he never mentioned that it was Bill Clinton who touted the era of big government ending when he was president. He also pretty much called Obama naive for all his talk about ending partisanship in Washington and his willingness to work with Republicans, suggesting he doesn't know how hard core the right wing is.

They also ripped Obama for his comments regarding funding the war, saying he has refused to talk about discrepancies in what he said before coming to the U.S. Senate and after.

So, when we got around to asking questions, I asked, if you want to talk about not talking about certain items on the campaign trail by Obama, why don't you mention the laudatory comments both Clintons have made about the Reagans? None of those have been mentioned, even in that radio ad Clinton released, which was a flat out lie. I even referenced a column by E.J. Dionne in the Washington Post that detailed Bill Clinton's views on Reagan.

The second question dealt with comments made by a South Carolina councilwoman, Bernice Scott, who said on my radio show today that the focus should not be on Bill Clinton but on the actual candidate, Sen. Clinton.

When it was time to answer, McCurry and Frank droned on about the Bill Clinton presidency and and didn't even attempt to answer my question.

I fired off an email to press reps, Phil Singer and Traci Blunt, saying that I don't like wasting time. If folks want to spin, fine. But don't ask for questions and then not answer me.

Singer said he would call me to respond, and I said to talk to me after 2 p.m. EST. It's now 5:39 p.m. EST and still no answers.

By the way, when the next Obama conference call is held, I'll also ask questions, and will also expect answer.

Don't think for a second that I'm going to let up. On the Democratic or Republican side.

UPDATE: It's 8:33 p.m. EST and still no response to my questions.

UPDATE: It's 8:21 a.m. EST the next day and still no response to my questions.

UPDATE: It's 11:19 a.m. EST and still no response.

Michael Dyson: Clintons using race-based, southern strategy against Obama

The Rev. Michael Eric Dyson has been a consistent supporter of Sen. Barack Obama for a long time (What's interesting is that his wife, Rev. Marcia Dyson, is a big supporter of Sen. Hillary Clinton).

In the interview on WVON-AM/Chicago, he blasted the Clinton campaign for their focus on race and gender, saying they are using a southern strategy, long used by the Republican Party since Richard Nixon ran for office in 1968.


powered by ODEO

South Carolina councilwoman discusses why she is backing Clinton

I talked this morning on WVON-AM/Chicago with Bernice G. Scott, chair of the council in Richland County, South Carolina. She discusses her support for Sen. Hillary Clinton, but when I asked if she will do more for African Americans as president than Sen. Barack Obama, she wasn't as forthcoming.


powered by ODEO

January 24, 2008

Clinton: I won't attack if Obama doesn't attack

Monday, January 21, was the national celebration of the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., who focused on non-violence.

But anybody watching the Democratic debate that night from South Carolina would have thought honoring the legacy of King was the last thing on the minds of the candidates, namely Senators Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama.

Both came out swinging, and while their campaigns suggested they couldn't help but defend themselves from factual errors, voters were turned off by the fisticuffs.

So, during an interview Thursday on "The Michael Baisden Show," I joined Mike in interviewing Clinton, and both of us asked her if she would take a pledge to end the attacks if Obama does.

"Absolutely!" she replied, adding that both should focus on the issues.

I added that ending the attacks also includes focusing on the issue of race and gender.


powered by ODEO
Question of the Day: Are you offended by the attacks between both candidates, or does it help you determine who you will vote for?

January 23, 2008

Ignoring White Dems in S.C. isn't Smart

Ever since we got into the thick of the presidential race, candidates, reporters, anchors, pundits, columnists and writers have spent a considerable amount of time on the fact that nearly 50 percent of voters in the South Carolina primary are black.

Considering you have a black male candidate — he's really half-white (mom) and half-Kenyan (dad) but identifies himself as African-American — and a white woman, who is the wife of a former president beloved by black folks, leading the pack for the Democratic nomination, everyone has been waiting to see how this fight will turn out.

But for the life of me, I don't understand — and I literally have been screaming this fact on CNN, on my Chicago radio show and on every possible platform I have — how we can focus on blacks making up nearly 50 percent of the voters and absolutely, positively, unequivocally ignore the other 50 percent!

Being a black man, I don't mind talking about the nuances of black politics — I've run three black newspapers, a black Web site and been the news editor of a national black magazine — but I also can count. And to suggest that white voters are immaterial in South Carolina is nuts.

It has been so stunning that I can't even recall the last time I've seen journalists spend a lot of time interviewing whites. The stories have focused on black preachers, the tough choice facing black women, and whether young black voters will come to the polls.

In some respect, there is a blackout when it comes to talking to white voters.

One of the reasons for this seeming disparity is that this is the first state where black voters will play a critical role. And on Feb. 5, we're likely to see a similar focus in Alabama, Mississippi, Virginia, Louisiana, Georgia and Tennessee, where black voters range from 20 percent to 50 percent of Democratic voters.

But this is a dangerous game to play because it is wrong to ignore half the electorate in a state. We also need to be analyzing the white vote to gain a better understanding as to what may happen in future states.

With that in mind, I reached out to CNN's Bill Schneider, and he shot me an e-mail with the results of the ARG poll taken Jan.

17-18. That poll revealed that among whites, Clinton is attracting 56 percent of the vote in South Carolina; Obama, 20 percent; and Edwards is polling at 16 percent.

For African-Americans, Obama is receiving 73 percent, and Clinton is at 16 percent.

So, what does this tell us? First, while Obama is running a campaign that isn't based on race and is trying to connect with people across the political spectrum, this first Southern state test shows that he isn't even reaching one-third of white voters. Edwards being in the race could be a big reason, but his support conceivably could go to Clinton.

Obama did far better in Nevada — Clinton received 52 percent to his 34 percent — but when it comes to winning the South, he is going to have to do more to appeal to these voters if he wants to win enough delegates for the nomination.

Not every state moving forward has such significant black support as South Carolina. Sure, Obama won Iowa. But geography plays a role in how people vote, and the people of Georgia or Nebraska may not see him the same as those in Iowa.

And when we go further inside the numbers, we discover that Clinton has a man problem. She does not poll well among men — black or white — which means she is even more reliant on women to get her the nomination, the general election or both.

A lot of voters have told us that they don't care about race or gender — that the issues trump everything. Sorry, the numbers just don't lie. When large numbers of women, African-Americans, whites or Hispanics fall to one candidate, then there is something about that group that is choosing the candidate. The issues could be the decider, but race or gender also could be at play.

At the end of the day, our job is to delve into every aspect of the campaign and go where the numbers take us. And to give short shrift to white voters who make up half a state party's vote total means that we aren't living up to our responsibility.

In the words of Paul Harvey, it's time for "the rest of the story."

January 22, 2008

Influential South Carolina paper endorses Obama

Following the endorsement of Sen. John McCain for the Republican nomination for president, South Carolina's The State newspaper has endorsed Sen. Barack Obama.

Read their endorsement.

Watch the explanation of the endorsement.

King confidant: Candidates must stop evoking King for political gain

The personal lawyer, draft speechwriter and confidant to the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. said he is sick and tired of presidential candidates trying desperately to link themselves to the legacy of the civil rights leader.

Clarence B. Jones, a prominent businessman and attorney, told me this morning that with the recent disputes among Sen. Hillary Clinton and Sen. Barack Obama about King and President Lyndon Baines Johnson, as well as the discussion in last night’s debate regarding who King would endorse, is silly.

“I don’t understand this pre-occupation with Martin King did this, Martin King did that,” said Jones, who accused candidates on both sides of the political spectrum of trying “to expropriate Martin’s legitimacy for their own purposes.

“And I guess that’s just the nature of politics. It’s regrettable,” Jones said.

During last night’s CNN-CBC Institute debate, all three presidential candidates evoked the name of King and his legacy (It’s worth noting that the debate was held on the national celebration of the King holiday).

When asked by CNN’s Wolf Blitzer if King were alive today would endorse any of them, Edwards said yes, he would back his candidacy.

Obama said King wouldn’t endorse any candidate. But it was the answer by Clinton that piqued my interest that led me to reach out to Jones for clarification.

She suggested in her answer that Dr. King was a civil rights activist, but didn’t shy away from being involved in politics.

“He campaigned for political leaders,” Clinton said. “He lobbied them. He pushed them. He cajoled. He did everything he could to get them over the line so that they would be part of the movement that he gave his life for.”

I emailed Phil Singer, a spokesman for the Clinton campaign, and he replied with an excerpt from the King papers at Stanford University backing up Clinton’s assertion:

"Later that year, Johnson won a decisive victory in the 1964 election, garnering the widest popular margin in presidential history. King had campaigned actively for Johnson and welcomed the victory saying, ‘the forces of good will and progress have triumphed’ (King, 4 November 1964).”

But Jones, who is writing his memoirs while in residence at Stanford's Martin Luther King, Jr. Research and Education Institute, disputes that.

“What Martin did was he campaigned hard for voter registration, and he spoke about the dangers of possibly Goldwater election,” he said. “He did talk about that. But he was not in any way part of the Johnson campaign.

“His way of doing it was to point out how important it was that as many black voters come to the polls as possible.”

He did say he found Clinton’s repeated mentions of LBJ to be interesting because “she was a Goldwater Republican in 1964,” and a staunch opponent to civil rights.

Then again, Jones said, “We all can change.”

But Nick Kotz, author of Judgment Days: Lyndon Baines Johnson, Martin Luther King, Jr., and the Laws That Changed America, told me that the Stanford papers and Jones are both right.

“At the Democratic convention in 1964, they had this big fight about seating the Mississippi delegation. And Dr. King was being very pragmatic about this thing. He didn’t want to fall on his sword. He wanted Johnson to get elected president and for them to work on the voting rights law. Out of that conflict was a deal that King would go out and campaign, and he went to six, seven and eight cities – I’ve got the clips and so forth – and he was asking people to register to vote, but he was trying to get Lyndon Johnson elected.

“He wasn’t just telling them to register to vote. He was talking at rallies in each city that were organized by the Johnson campaign. They (Stanford and Jones) are really both right. At each stop did he say, ‘Vote for Lyndon Johnson?’ He may not have done that, but that’s what the whole thing was all about.”

Ruby Dee gets an Oscar nod!

One of the things I most hated about the death of Ossie Davis on Feb. 4, 2005, was the fact that the Academy Awards never got around to recognizing the lifetime achievement of such a fine actor, as well as his wife, Ruby Dee.

The both of them were two of the most amazing actors, equally talented on the big screen as the small; and on Broadway and off. There was no medium they couldn't excel at, and it would have been so nice for these lifelong activists to be rewarded for their incredible work.

That's why I was so elated this morning to hear that Dee was nominated for a Best Supporting Actress Oscar for her role as "Mama Lucas" in the movie, "American Gangster." Her role was not large. But superb actors don't need lots of words. Their actions, body movements or just a stare, can say all that needs to be said.

She is truly a remarkable woman who has never been awarded anything by the mainstream arts community for her substantive roles. But too us, Ruby Dee is indeed Hollywood royalty.

Bill Clinton embracing 'The Dream'; Romney's 'bling'

Now we've all fallen asleep in church. But let's be honest, this video is hilarious!

Sleepy Bill Clinton

Question of the Day: Was Bill tired, or the speech by Martin Luther King III?

Also, don't you love it when white guys really try to be hip? Especially Republicans?! Check out Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney embrace the "bling" and in search of all the "dawgs in the house!"

Was Bill Clinton the first female president?

Let me be clear: the statement issued by Nobel and Pulitzer Prize winner Toni Morrison that Bill Clinton was the first black president is one of the dumbest and most ridiculous comments ever uttered.

The fact that people actually go around stating that shows how nonsensical some folks are. Sure, he was comfortable around black folks, but that somehow gives him a full understanding of what it means to be black in America? Let him try to catch a cab with me and we'll see who is blacker.

But I digress.

Let's assume for a moment that we do look at the policies of President Clinton and accept that he did right by African Americans. But what about women?

He appointed the first attorney general in Janet Reno. The first female secretary of state was Madeleine Albright. He had a number of female members of his cabinet, including Alexis Herman (Labor) and Hazel O'Leary (Energy).

So why isn't he called America's first female president?

Surely he did a lot for women, was comfortable around them, and enjoyed high approval ratings from women throughout his presidency.

If that's the barometer for calling him the nation's first black president, should he be able to wear a second crown?

Is Sen. Clinton abandoning South Carolina?

During last night's CNN-Congressional Black Caucus Institute debate in Myrtle Beach, S.C., Sen. Barack Obama took a shot at Sen. Hillary Clinton, saying he wasn't sure if he was running against her or former president Bill Clinton.

"I'm here. He's not," she shot back.

But is that really the case?

While Obama continues to canvass the Palmetto State today, Clinton has decided to head to Washington, D.C., then California and Arizona.

According to an email from her camp, Clinton "will hold a press availability at the Westin Hotel on Embassy Row in Washington D.C. later this morning.

"She will then travel to California where she participates in a “Solutions for America” town hall in Salinas, Calif., followed by a town hall in Laveen, Ariz.

"On Wednesday, January 23, Hillary attends events in New Jersey.  She travels through South Carolina on Thursday, January 24 through Saturday, January 26."

So who is holding down the fort in South Carolina? Bill and their daughter, Chelsea.

No one minds spouses and children campaigning. But don't you think that if Sen. Clinton wants to make the case that she's the one, she needs to be the one going door-to-door? Or does this add more fuel to the fire that it's Bill who is running against Obama?

January 21, 2008

King heir on the way

For the longest, none of the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.'s children got married or had children.

That's changed.

Martin Luther King III announced over the weekend that he has been married for two years and he and his wife are expecting a daughter.

He said they were married shortly after the death of his mother, Coretta Scott King.

Obama, Clinton fighting hard for black votes

Good afternoon! I'm in Wilmington, Delaware today to give the keynote address at their Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. celebration, and this place is packed!

They expect several thousand folks to be in attendance, so it's going to be fabulous. Then I'm off to the train station to book it to New York for CNN's race and politics special tonight following the CNN-Congressional Black Caucus Institute debate.

And folks, I can tell you, today has been wild!

First, my phone has been blowing up with calls and emails as both sides go hot and heavy in South Carolina. This is the first primary where black voters are going to have a major say, and by all the action, it will be huge.

Obama was at Ebenezer Baptist Church yesterday in Atlanta; former President Bill Clinton will be there today.

Obama and Sen. Hillary Clinton are all over South Carolina today, and their surrogates are hitting the trail, calling into radio shows, and doing all they can to get the vote out.

Fresh off a stinging defeat in Nevada, the Obama camp is going after the Clintons, with even the candidate saying he's going to fight them on distorting his words and record.

So, the real issue, is whether you think Obama will pull enough of the black vote to win the Palmetto State? Or will the Clintons beat him to the punch and take the first southern primary?

January 20, 2008

Sen. Barack Obama's speech Sunday at Ebenezer Baptist Church, Atlanta

Remarks of Senator Barack Obama
The Great Need of the Hour
Ebenezer Baptist Church
Sunday, January 20th, 2008
Atlanta, Georgia
 EMBARGOED for Delivery

The Scripture tells us that when Joshua and the Israelites arrived at the gates of Jericho, they could not enter.  The walls of the city were too steep for any one person to climb; too strong to be taken down with brute force.  And so they sat for days, unable to pass on through.   

But God had a plan for his people.  He told them to stand together and march together around the city, and on the seventh day he told them that when they heard the sound of the ram’s horn, they should speak with one voice.  And at the chosen hour, when the horn sounded and a chorus of voices cried out together, the mighty walls of Jericho came tumbling down.

There are many lessons to take from this passage, just as there are many lessons to take from this day, just as there are many memories that fill the space of this church.  As I was thinking about which ones we need to remember at this hour, my mind went back to the very beginning of the modern Civil Rights Era.   

Because before Memphis and the mountaintop; before the bridge in Selma and the march on Washington; before Birmingham and the beatings; the fire hoses and the loss of those four little girls; before there was King the icon and his magnificent dream, there was King the young preacher and a people who found themselves suffering under the yolk of oppression. 

And on the eve of the bus boycotts in Montgomery, at a time when many were still doubtful about the possibilities of change, a time when those in the black community mistrusted themselves, and at times mistrusted each other, King inspired with words not of anger, but of an urgency that still speaks to us today:

“Unity is the great need of the hour” is what King said.  Unity is how we shall overcome. 

What Dr. King understood is that if just one person chose to walk instead of ride the bus, those walls of oppression would not be moved.  But maybe if a few more walked, the foundation might start to shake.  If a few more women were willing to do what Rosa Parks had done, maybe the cracks would start to show.  If teenagers took freedom rides from North to South, maybe a few bricks would come loose.  Maybe if white folks marched because they had come to understand that their freedom too was at stake in the impending battle, the wall would begin to sway.  And if enough Americans were awakened to the injustice; if they joined together, North and South, rich and poor, Christian and Jew, then perhaps that wall would come tumbling down, and justice would flow like water, and righteousness like a mighty stream.

Unity is the great need of the hour – the great need of this hour.  Not because it sounds pleasant or because it makes us feel good, but because it’s the only way we can overcome the essential deficit that exists in this country. 

I’m not talking about a budget deficit.  I’m not talking about a trade deficit.  I’m not talking about a deficit of good ideas or new plans. 

I’m talking about a moral deficit.  I’m talking about an empathy deficit.  I’m taking about an inability to recognize ourselves in one another; to understand that we are our brother’s keeper; we are our sister’s keeper; that, in the words of Dr. King, we are all tied together in a single garment of destiny. 

We have an empathy deficit when we’re still sending our children down corridors of shame – schools in the forgotten corners of America where the color of your skin still affects the content of your education.

We have a deficit when CEOs are making more in ten minutes than some workers make in ten months; when families lose their homes so that lenders make a profit; when mothers can’t afford a doctor when their children get sick.

We have a deficit in this country when there is Scooter Libby justice for some and Jena justice for others; when our children see nooses hanging from a schoolyard tree today, in the present, in the twenty-first century.  

We have a deficit when homeless veterans sleep on the streets of our cities; when innocents are slaughtered in the deserts of Darfur; when young Americans serve tour after tour of duty in a war that should’ve never been authorized and never been waged.

And we have a deficit when it takes a breach in our levees to reveal a breach in our compassion; when it takes a terrible storm to reveal the hungry that God calls on us to feed; the sick He calls on us to care for; the least of these He commands that we treat as our own. 

So we have a deficit to close.  We have walls – barriers to justice and equality – that must come down.  And to do this, we know that unity is the great need of this hour. 

Unfortunately, all too often when we talk about unity in this country, we’ve come to believe that it can be purchased on the cheap.  We’ve come to believe that racial reconciliation can come easily – that it’s just a matter of a few ignorant people trapped in the prejudices of the past, and that if the demagogues and those who exploit our racial divisions will simply go away, then all our problems would be solved. 

All too often, we seek to ignore the profound institutional barriers that stand in the way of ensuring opportunity for all children, or decent jobs for all people, or health care for those who are sick.  We long for unity, but are unwilling to pay the price. 

But of course, true unity cannot be so easily won.  It starts with a change in attitudes – a broadening of our minds, and a broadening of our hearts. 

It’s not easy to stand in somebody else’s shoes.  It’s not easy to see past our differences.  We’ve all encountered this in our own lives.  But what makes it even more difficult is that we have a politics in this country that seeks to drive us apart – that puts up walls between us. 

We are told that those who differ from us on a few things are different from us on all things; that our problems are the fault of those who don’t think like us or look like us or come from where we do.  The welfare queen is taking our tax money.  The immigrant is taking our jobs.  The believer condemns the non-believer as immoral, and the non-believer chides the believer as intolerant. 

For most of this country’s history, we in the African-American community have been at the receiving end of man’s inhumanity to man.  And all of us understand intimately the insidious role that race still sometimes plays – on the job, in the schools, in our health care system, and in our criminal justice system. 

And yet, if we are honest with ourselves, we must admit that none of our hands are entirely clean.  If we’re honest with ourselves, we’ll acknowledge that our own community has not always been true to King’s vision of a beloved community. 

We have scorned our gay brothers and sisters instead of embracing them. The scourge of anti-Semitism has, at times, revealed itself in our community.  For too long, some of us have seen immigrants as competitors for jobs instead of companions in the fight for opportunity. 

Every day, our politics fuels and exploits this kind of division across all races and regions; across gender and party.  It is played out on television.  It is sensationalized by the media.  And last week, it even crept into the campaign for President, with charges and counter-charges that served to obscure the issues instead of illuminating the critical choices we face as a nation. 

So let us say that on this day of all days, each of us carries with us the task of changing our hearts and minds.  The division, the stereotypes, the scape-goating, the ease with which we blame our plight on others – all of this distracts us from the common challenges we face – war and poverty; injustice and inequality.  We can no longer afford to build ourselves up by tearing someone else down.  We can no longer afford to traffic in lies or fear or hate.  It is the poison that we must purge from our politics; the wall that we must tear down before the hour grows too late.   

Because if Dr. King could love his jailor; if he could call on the faithful who once sat where you do to forgive those who set dogs and fire hoses upon them, then surely we can look past what divides us in our time, and bind up our wounds, and erase the empathy deficit that exists in our hearts. 

But if changing our hearts and minds is the first critical step, we cannot stop there.  It is not enough to bemoan the plight of poor children in this country and remain unwilling to push our elected officials to provide the resources to fix our schools.  It is not enough to decry the disparities of health care and yet allow the insurance companies and the drug companies to block much-needed reforms.  It is not enough for us to abhor the costs of a misguided war, and yet allow ourselves to be driven by a politics of fear that sees the threat of attack as way to scare up votes instead of a call to come together around a common effort.

The Scripture tells us that we are judged not just by word, but by deed.  And if we are to truly bring about the unity that is so crucial in this time, we must find it within ourselves to act on what we know; to understand that living up to this country’s ideals and its possibilities will require great effort and resources; sacrifice and stamina.

And that is what is at stake in the great political debate we are having today. The changes that are needed are not just a matter of tinkering at the edges, and they will not come if politicians simply tell us what we want to hear.  All of us will be called upon to make some sacrifice.  None of us will be exempt from responsibility.  We will have to fight to fix our schools, but we will also have to challenge ourselves to be better parents.  We will have to confront the biases in our criminal justice system, but we will also have to acknowledge the deep-seated violence that still resides in our own communities and marshal the will to break its grip. 

That is how we will bring about the change we seek.  That is how Dr. King led this country through the wilderness. He did it with words – words that he spoke not just to the children of slaves, but the children of slave owners. Words that inspired not just black but also white; not just the Christian but the Jew; not just the Southerner but also the Northerner. 

He led with words, but he also led with deeds.  He also led by example.  He led by marching and going to jail and suffering threats and being away from his family. He led by taking a stand against a war, knowing full well that it would diminish his popularity.  He led by challenging our economic structures, understanding that it would cause discomfort.  Dr. King understood that unity cannot be won on the cheap; that we would have to earn it through great effort and determination.

That is the unity – the hard-earned unity – that we need right now. It is that effort, and that determination, that can transform blind optimism into hope – the hope to imagine, and work for, and fight for what seemed impossible before.

The stories that give me such hope don’t happen in the spotlight.  They don’t happen on the presidential stage. They happen in the quiet corners of our lives.  They happen in the moments we least expect.  Let me give you an example of one of those stories.

There is a young, twenty-three year old white woman named Ashley Baia who organizes for our campaign in Florence, South Carolina.  She’s been working to organize a mostly African-American community since the beginning of this campaign, and the other day she was at a roundtable discussion where everyone went around telling their story and why they were there. 

And Ashley said that when she was nine years old, her mother got cancer.  And because she had to miss days of work, she was let go and lost her health care.  They had to file for bankruptcy, and that’s when Ashley decided that she had to do something to help her mom.

She knew that food was one of their most expensive costs, and so Ashley convinced her mother that what she really liked and really wanted to eat more than anything else was mustard and relish sandwiches.  Because that was the cheapest way to eat.

She did this for a year until her mom got better, and she told everyone at the roundtable that the reason she joined our campaign was so that she could help the millions of other children in the country who want and need to help their parents too.

So Ashley finishes her story and then goes around the room and asks everyone else why they’re supporting the campaign.  They all have different stories and reasons.  Many bring up a specific issue.  And finally they come to this elderly black man who’s been sitting there quietly the entire time.  And Ashley asks him why he’s there.  And he does not bring up a specific issue.  He does not say health care or the economy.  He does not say education or the war.   He does not say that he was there because of Barack Obama.  He simply says to everyone in the room, “I am here because of Ashley.” 

By itself, that single moment of recognition between that young white girl and that old black man is not enough.  It is not enough to give health care to the sick, or jobs to the jobless, or education to our children.

But it is where we begin.  It is why the walls in that room began to crack and shake.   

And if they can shake in that room, they can shake in Atlanta. 

And if they can shake in Atlanta, they can shake in Georgia. 

And if they can shake in Georgia, they can shake all across America.  And if enough of our voices join together; we can bring those walls tumbling down.  The walls of Jericho can finally come tumbling down.  That is our hope – but only if we pray together, and work together, and march together. 

Brothers and sisters, we cannot walk alone. 

In the struggle for peace and justice, we cannot walk alone. 

In the struggle for opportunity and equality, we cannot walk alone 

In the struggle to heal this nation and repair this world, we cannot walk alone. 

So I ask you to walk with me, and march with me, and join your voice with mine, and together we will sing the song that tears down the walls that divide us, and lift up an America that is truly indivisible, with liberty, and justice, for all.  May God bless the memory of the great pastor of this church, and may God bless the United States of America.

###

Embargoed for Delivery
 January 20, 2007

January 18, 2008

Federal judge tosses Nevada teachers suit

Looks like democracy still reigns in America!

A federal judge in Nevada yesterday refused to allow a lawsuit to go forward, saying the Nevada Democratic Party has a right to set their own rules.

The suit by the 28,000-member Nevada State Education Association was filed two days after the 60,000-strong Culinary Workers Union Local 226 endorsed Sen. Barack Obama for president.

The camp of Sen. Hillary Clinton has steadfastly said they had nothing to do with the suit, even though several of the top folks in the teachers union are backing Clinton.

I'm just so sick of people screwing with the voters. We need MORE opportunities to vote, not efforts to suppress the vote. I don't care if they are Democrats or Republicans, stopping folks from going to the polls is simply wrong.

Question of the Day: Do you think the decision by the Nevada teachers union will cause more backlash against Sen. Clinton when the caucuses convene tomorrow?

January 17, 2008

Johnson apologizes to Obama

So I guess Bob Johnson has recognized that he was wrong for disparaging Sen. Barack Obama.

After spending three days defending his comments ripping Obama while introducing Sen. Hillary Clinton on Sunday in South Carolina, made reference to his drug use as a teenager.

Today, he talked to CNN's Suzanne Malveaux and admitted that he was wrong and sent a letter to the campaign.

Here is the letter:

"Dear Barack,

I'm writing to apologize to you and your family personally for the un-called-for comments I made at a recent Clinton event. In my zeal to support Senator Clinton, I made some very inappropriate remarks for which I am truly sorry. I hope that you will accept this apology. Good luck on the campaign trail.

Warm regards,

Bob Johnson"

Some folks are ticked that he referred to Obama by his first name in the letter and not as Sen. Obama, noting that he didn't call Sen. Clinton "Hillary."

Whatcha think?

January 16, 2008

Democrats should put Nevada teacher’s union on blast

Democrats all over the country yelled, screamed and kicked in 2000 and 2004, alleging massive voter fraud in Florida, Ohio and other states, suggesting that the Republicans and George W. Bush were denying ordinary Americans their right to vote.

So can someone explain to me why the feckless, weak, impotent and hypocritical leaders of the Democratic Party are absolutely silent over the

Nevada teachers union having the audacity to sue the state party over the caucus on Saturday?

What these unpatriotic bums, known as the Nevada State Education Association, allege in their suit is that the decision to allow at-large precincts in hotels along the Las Vegas strip, established to allow hotel workers who work 24 hours a day to vote, violates the equal protection clause of the U.S. Constitution.

The Nevada Democratic Party determines delegates by precinct, and the teachers say the large number of likely voters in these nine precincts will give them too much influence in the party, thus diminishing the state’s other precincts.

How about calling this what it is…a bunch of crap.

Of course, some are suggesting politics is playing a role in all of this.

The lawsuit was conveniently filed three days after Culinary Workers Union, Local 226, endorsed Sen. Barack Obama for president. The teachers union hasn’t officially endorsed anyone, but several of their top officials are working on behalf of Sen. Hillary Clinton.

Naturally, the Obama camp is ticked off by the teachers’ decision, and even some teachers have written to area newspapers that they are sickened by their union’s action.

The Clinton camp denies any involvement in the suit, telling the Associated Press that she hope the issue "can be resolved by the courts and the state party because obviously, we want as many people as possible to be able to participate ... In the meantime, I'm just going to campaign as hard as I can here in Nevada."

On Sunday, she told NBC News: "I don't want to disenfranchise anybody."

But according to the Las Vegas Sun, on Monday, her husband, former President Bill Clinton, “endorsed the principle of the lawsuit Monday and questioned the fairness of the at-large sites.
“‘The Democratic Party authorized nine different work sites, and you can only caucus there if you work there,’” he said while talking to students at Green Valley High School. “‘So everyone else who works, it’s tough luck, too bad for you.”

It’s too bad that President Clinton has abandoned his role as the standard bearer of the Democratic Party and chosen to ignore the very ideals he trumpeted as president.

Look, folks, this is not about Hillary Clinton, Obama or even John Edwards. It’s about fairness, and wanting people to do what far too many Americans take for granted: vote.

Frankly, each candidate should blast the teachers union’s decision as undemocratic and offensive. The union had nine months to raise their objections to the decision; it wasn’t a secret to anyone, and was approved by the Democratic National Committee.

But when the more powerful culinary union backed Obama, the teachers threw out civility and are trying to shut the caucuses down.

I’m just tired of these two-faced politicians and party hacks running down Republicans with charges of voter suppression, and the Democrats and one of their biggest base of supporters – a teachers union – turns around and does the same. They are disenfranchising their own party members, all in the name of politics.

At Tuesday’s Democratic debate, NBC’s Tim Russert and Brian Williams didn’t even bother to bring the issue up. Sure, there are many other issues that are important. But making it easier for Americans to vote isn’t one of them? They should have forced all three candidates to be on the record as to how they stand on the teachers union.

Americans love to criticize elections in other nation’s that we don’t think are done above board. We tell

Pakistan that there should be fair and free elections, and we denounce Robert Mugabe in Zimbabwefor his strong-armed tactics to keep the opposition party away from the polls.

I put the leadership of the Nevada State Education Association in the same boat as the dictators who want to hold onto power by denying others the right to vote. Their little petty action shows how small-minded they are, and not thinking about the greater importance of voting.

So, do me a favor. Click here and email each top official with the union and tell them that they are wrong to do what they are doing, and it’s not a move real Americans do. Or call 800-248-6732.

It’s time that we let unions, political parties or anyone else on the opposite sides of the political spectrum that we will fight like the dickens for the right to vote, and won’t be obstructed by some special interest looking to score a cheap political point.

Bishop Thomas Weeks speaks to Roland!

Hey, folks!

We here at Essence Magazine have been all over the Prophetess Juanita Bynum story, doing two interviews with her about domestic violence and the issues in her marriage to Bishop Thomas Weeks.

Well, Bishop Weeks speaks to me at 8 am EST this morning. You can listen at www.wvon.com.

Later, I'll have the audio from our interview. It shall be interesting!

Clinton: Bob Johnson's Obama comments "out of bounds"

The remaining Democratic candidates played nice in last night's debate from Las Vegas (well, except Dennis Kucinich, who was excluded), and race was at the top of the agenda.

All were asked about the brouhaha over the last several days between the camps of Senators Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton.

Moderator Tim Russert pushed Clinton on comments made by BET founder Bob Johnson that clearly brought up the issue of Obama's drug use, but which he later said wasn't the case. At first, Clinton said that Johnson addressed the issue and she took him at his word.

Yet Russert wasn't satisfied. He pushed her by asking if the comments were out of bounds, and she finally conceded that they were.

Question of the Day: Were you satisfied with Clinton saying Johnson's comments were "out of bounds," or should she have denounced them more forcefully?

January 15, 2008

back to the issues!

With all the back and forth about chatter regarding race and the Democratic race, don't you think we actually get back to race?

The top two Dems, Sen. Hillary Clinton and Sen. Barack Obama have both called timeout over the back and forth talk, and it has somewhat quieted their supporters.

And with all the drama, tons of ink and time spent on the airwaves about drugs as a teen, MLK and LBJ and shucking and jiving, nothing was being said about black women sitting at the top of those getting HIV; black male incarceration; a horrible education system in inner cities; and other issues.

Hopefully some of that will be discussed tonight at the Democratic debate in Nevada, which has the 100 Black Men as one of the sponsors.

So, if you had a chance to ask the candidates the ONE question that is tops for you, what would that be?

January 14, 2008

Listen to Roland interview former President Bill Clinton!

Check out the interview that the talk of the nation today!

Click here.

Race is the hot and heavy topic on the presidential trail!

Folks, everyone is talking about race and not THE race.

THE RACE is the presidential campaign. Race is the notion that the Clinton camp is trying to race bait the Obama camp, while the other view is that the Obama camp is playing the race card.

I thought this story was going to die down after Congressman Jim Clyburn backed off endorsing anyone on Friday. But Bob Johnson's comments on Sunday in South Carolina at a Clinton rally brought it back full steam.

I talked with former President Bill Clinton on my radio show today, and I've been swamped ever since, doing hits on CNN; appearing on Frank Ski's show in Atlanta; debating Bob Johnson on the Michael Baisden Show; taping an interview with the CBS Evening News; and prepping to be on The Situation Room, Lou Dobbs Tonight; and Anderson Cooper 360.

I've been having TONS of trouble updating my Clinton interview on Odeo.com. But here are some links that will help you navigate all of this:

Could race destroy the Democrats? 

CNN's Jack Cafferty: 'Racial fires burning brightly'?

Bill Clinton compiles 'list' of Obama attacks

Clinton backer appears to raise Obama's drug use

VIDEO

Martin: Race not Obama's focus

Mr. Clinton: Hillary is better

He (Obama) said, she (Clinton) said

January 11, 2008

Cuomo's office responds to shucking and jiving flap

I just talked with Jeffrey Lerner, a spokesman for New York Attorney General Mario Cuomo. Here is what he wrote me in an email:

Roland:

Thanks for taking a moment to talk with me.

Wanted to make sure you had all the facts regard to the comments by AG
Cuomo you refer to in your blog.

He wasn't referring to Obama, but rather to all the candidates and he
wasn't talking just about New Hampshire, but Iowa too and the importance
of retail politics in these important early small-state primaries.

The original transcript is pasted down below.

But first, here is what Rick Karlin - the Albany Times Union reporter
who wrote the original blog item on this - said to Salon.com, clarifying
his initial post:

Update: We just talked with Karlin, who told us that Cuomo's "shuck and
jive" remark was "so far removed, temporally and contextually, from any
discussion of Obama," that he didn't hear it as a reference to Obama at
all. Karlin pointed us to Newsday's Spin Cycle blog, which has posted a
partial transcript of the radio interview made from a tape provided to
it by Cuomo's office. The transcript confirms that Cuomo was answering a
general question about the retail nature of politics in Iowa and New
Hampshire generally, and there's nothing in his long answer to suggest
that he was referring to Obama rather than to politicians in general.

Here is the relevent portion of the transcript:

Fred Dicker: You know I've said this on my show before, I think the
American people are very lucky to have most these candidates, the major
party candidates, I think they're all quality people, they have
disagreements, but they're all quite talented, and I think the people of
Iowa and now New Hampshire really have allowed the rest of America to
see much of this because I think to their great credit it requires
politicians to kind of get down, not kind of, get down in the
grassroots, I think I heard John McCain say he had something like 110
community meeting before the primaries - fabulous - you know, I wish we
could see that here in New York.

Andrew Cuomo: You know I've spent a lot of time in other races,
especially in Iowa and in New Hampshire, back with Gore and back with
Clinton. Those races require you to do something no other race does,
you know, and I like it, and I agree with you, it's a good thing. It's
not a TV-crazed race, you know, you can't just buy your way through that
race [FD: Airport press conference and the media markets…..], it doesn't
work that way, it's frankly a more demanding process. You have to get on
a bus, you have to go into a diner, you have to shake hands, you have to
sit down with ten people in a living room. You can't shuck and jive at a
press conference, you can't just put off reporters, because you have
real people looking at you saying answer the question, you know, and all
those moves you can make with the press don't work when you're in
someone's living room. And I think it's good for the candidates, I
think it makes the candidates communicate in a way that works with real
people because you know in a living room right away whether or not
you're communicating, and I think the questions are good and I think the
scrutiny is good, so you can, you can say they're small states and they
get a lot of attention -- they are very good for the process, I believe
that.

Marion Jones sentenced to six months in prison

Former track star Marion Jones, who mesmerized the world with her blazing speed, only to later be shown to be a fraud because of her use of performance enhancing drugs, was sentenced to six months in prison for lying to federal officials in their investigation.

Jones, one of the most decorated female athletes in track history, gave up all her gold medals when she pled guilty a few months ago.

She pleaded for leniency because of her two children, but U.S. District Judge Kenneth Karas gave her the longest sentence possible because of a need for it to serve as a deterrent for others.


Clinton working overtime to clean up King-LBJ comments