« February 2008 | Main | April 2008 »

March 2008

-->

March 31, 2008

Secretary of State Rice speaks forcefully about race in America

Sen. Barack Obama has called for a national discussion on race in America, and one of the folks who sure didn't hold back when asked was Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice.

In a discussion with the editorial board of the Washington Times on Thursday, Rice called racism a "birth defect" of America, and said that black Americans have loved the nation even when it didn't love us.

The Times reported:

“Black Americans were a founding population," she said. "Africans and Europeans came here and founded this country together — Europeans by choice and Africans in chains. That's not a very pretty reality of our founding.”

“As a result, Miss Rice told editors and reporters at The Washington Times, "descendants of slaves did not get much of a head start, and I think you continue to see some of the effects of that."

"That particular birth defect makes it hard for us to confront it, hard for us to talk about it, and hard for us to realize that it has continuing relevance for who we are today," she said.

She later said: "America doesn't have an easy time dealing with race," Miss Rice said, adding that members of her family have "endured terrible humiliations."

"What I would like understood as a black American is that black Americans loved and had faith in this country even when this country didn't love and have faith in them — and that's our legacy," she said.

Wow was all I could say to that.

What was even more stunning was the relative lack of coverage on this issue.

I sent an email out to my folks at CNN, and was told that "The Situation Room" did a piece on her comments on Friday. But when I surfed the Net to see follow-up stories in other papers, it has pretty much been ignored, except for some briefs.

Why would the mainstream media be so dismissive of Rice's comments? Imagine if Rev. Al Sharpton or Rev. Jesse Jackson Sr. said such a thing. Do you think they would have gotten ripped?

The fact of the matter is that Rice was right on the money with her comments, and should be commended. She spoke honestly and openly about the issue, and deserves credit for speaking the truth.

I just wish my colleagues in the media would do a better job at advancing the issue of race in America and our sordid history.

We went bonkers about the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, but when Rice, the nation’s chief diplomat, spoke truthfully, it barely made a ripple.

Click here to read the Washington Times report.

March 28, 2008

Conservatives in love with a crazy Harlem pastor

A lot of you guys keep sending me emails asking, "Who is this crazy pastor from New York who is dogging Obama and supporting Hillary?"

His name is James Manning, and he's the pastor of Atlah Ministries. Apparently he doesn't believe Harlem should be called Harlem, so he's decided to change the name.

A lot of the conservative talkers have had him on their shows, and they are loving them some James Manning. Basically, he's the latest minstrel show/flavor of the month. I read a story that suggested that WABC Radio in New York plays his anti-Obama rants over and over.

I even called him and had him on my radio show to understand what his problem is, and for an hour he was all over the place, calling Obama every name under the sun. This was early on. He's gotten worse since we talked.

Let me simply explain what is going on here. James Manning is a nobody. He has a ministry that no one knows about. He has no significant theological standing. But he knows how to use YouTube. And what is he doing is using technology to spread his hate, and then get picked up by radio shows and TV shows across the land.

Everybody wants their 15 minutes of fame, and by dogging Obama, he's getting his.

We've seen this game before. OK, fine. That's how he wants to be known. He loves to talk about the breast size of Obama girl; says Obama pimps white women; and other trash.

This is not about news. It's not about substance. It's simply about a guy who otherwise would NEVER get on TV all of a sudden getting on TV.

Pure and simple.

If you want to view him in all his glory, go to YouTube and check him out. I won't sully the reputation of this website with his nonsense.

March 25, 2008

My response to O'Reilly after watching his segment about me

I wasn't sure if my emails were going to get to Bill O'Reilly, so I decided to send them along to Bill Shine, senior vice president of programming, and Joel Cheatwood, senior vice president of development at Fox News.

I know Joel because he was in a similar position at CNN and I worked with him on some programming while he was there. I always like Joel and thought he was a fair and talented guy. So what the heck, I figured that if Bill's email wasn't the same as everyone else at Fox News, then Joel could pass it along.

Here is what I just sent Bill:

Bill and Joel,

Just in case Bill doesn't get this, be sure to pass along.

"Oh, Bill, I just watched your segment, and talk about weak!

"Please, please, call me so we can discuss the issue.

"You tell your audience that I'm a Wright apologist, but you don't even bother to tell your audience what I even said on the issue. Dude, that's Journalism 101. You offer no facts, no analysis, just a weak opinion. You paraphrased me saying that I didn't think the issue is no big deal. WRONG. Then you, and Bernard Goldberg, go on to state some of the "crazy" things, as Bernie said, that Wright has said.

"Did you bother to even see that I said ON CNN that what he said about the AIDS issue is flat out wrong? And what he said about the government injecting blacks with syphilis was wrong? BUT it is correct that the federal government allowed black men to go untreated. It is known as the Tuskegee Experiment, something President Bill Clinton apologized for.

"If you want to tell your audience that I'm an apologist, do me the favor and say what I said, as opposed to show a photo of me and offer no facts whatsoever.

"Oh by the way, Bill, Bernie noticed that I'm a black guy and then decided to go on and discuss white liberals.

"Please, ask me if I'm a conservative or a liberal. Be upfront and ask me. Even you would be shocked by the answer.

"Again, just in case you actually want to have a conversation that is fact-based, call me at 4XX-XXX-XXXX.

"For someone who has done your show eight to 10 times, and who has actually defended you from the folks who think you are to the right of Hitler, I'm terribly disappointed that you were so weak with the facts. Had you worked under me at the three papers I've run, as well as website and radio station newsroom, you would have gotten verbally smacked down for such weak journalism.

"Call me. I'll be happy to chat with you."

See, a real debater would pick up the phone and accept the challenge. Let's see if Mr. No Spin Zone is really interested in the facts.

Bill O'Reilly calls me an apologist for Rev. Jeremiah Wright

On tonight's "O'Reilly Factor," I've been told that Bill O'Reilly called me out about the Rev. Jeremiah Wright issue. I was watching CNN and didn't see the show, but I'll watch the re-broadcast.

But here is the email I sent to Bill and two top Fox News Channel executives. Let's see if he takes me up on my offer.

"Hey, Bill! Someone sent me an email saying you called me out. First, thanks for the publicity, I appreciate that. Be sure to get the website right - ROLANDSMARTIN.COM.

"Now, I always enjoyed doing your show prior to me joining CNN.

"I missed your show because I was actually watching CNN - I'm sure you could figure that one out.

"Now, I can't come on your air because I'm under contract. But I'll be happy to do your radio show - any time, any day, any where - to discuss this issue.

"My cell is 4XX-XXX-XXXX.

"Call me. I'll be happy to chat with you on this subject."

Controversial associations touch all prez candidates

Its been an interesting week watching folks analyze the outcry over the controversial comments by the Rev. Jeremiah Wright of Chicago’s Trinity United Church of Christ, especially when they try to link them to Sen. Barack Obama.

Obama’s supporters say it’s wrong to associate his views with that of his pastor. His opponents say that surely his views and inexplicably linked with those of Wright, including the pastor’s praise of Nation of Islam Minister Louis Farrakhan. Even conservative talker Sean Hannity was foaming at the mouth, calling Wright a racist and an anti-Semite, and then saying we all should assume Obama is also a racist and an anti-Semite.

Talk about a stretch.

Frankly, it’s just not plausible to suggest that you always share the same feelings or views as someone you know.

In remarks to a Pittsburgh newspaper today, Clinton said, in response to a question about the Wright controversy, said, "You don't choose your family, but you choose what church you want to attend."

True. Very true. But there’s also some reality that politicians pick and choose who they want to be associated with.

Clinton pressed Obama during a debate this year to repudiate and denounce the unsolicited praise of him by Farrakhan that took place at an event the Nation of Islam leader organized for his group in Chicago.

The moderator, NBC’s Tim Russert, brought up comments made by Farrakhan 24 years ago in his question to Obama.

Fine, so what do we make of then-President Bill Clinton publicly endorsing the 1995 Million Man March? Who called for that march? Louis Farrakhan. Who was the lead organizer? Louis Farrakhan. Who was the keynote speaker? Louis Farrakhan.

After he was out of the White House, President Clinton also endorsed the Million Man March. Who called for that march? Louis Farrakhan. Who was the lead organizer? Louis Farrakhan. Who was the keynote speaker? Louis Farrakhan.

Did Sen. Clinton privately or publicly rebuke her husband for supporting a man who she has determined to be hateful and divisive?

Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell, who is national co-chair of Sen. Clinton’s presidential campaign, once stood on stage with Farrakhan in 1997 and praised him for his commitment to ending violence in the black community.

According to an April 15, 1997 story in the New York Times, Farrakhan praised Rendell before 3,000 at anti-violence rally for ''his courage and strength to rise above emotion and differences that might be between us or our communities.''

According to the Times, Rendell, who is Jewish, “commended the Nation of Islam for its emphasis on family values and self-sufficiency.”

Must Clinton repudiate and denounce Rendell’s past comments and association with Farrakhan?

Former Republican Congressman Jack Kemp is a huge supporter of Sen. John McCain, and he also has a Farrakhan story to tell.

In 1996, when Kemp was the vice presidential running mate of Kansas Sen. Bob Dole, he told reporters that he wanted to meet with Farrakhan; praised their focus on economic empowerment, family values and the pull-yourselves-up-by-the-bootstrap-message - which is right in line with the GOP talking points; and even said he wanted to speak at the Million Man March.

Boy, was he torn apart by Jewish critics, and many in his own party.

Kemp summarily criticized Farrakhan's comments about Jews and whites, but he didn't take his words back (By the way, Hannity pressed every African American supporter about Farrakhan, but he never got in Kemp’s face about his comments. I wonder why?).

Must McCain repudiate and denounce Kemp’s past comments and association with Farrakhan?

When it comes to homosexuality, no Clinton or Obama supporter should think of criticizing the other campaign’s black ministerial supporters because that means most of their own would have to be removed from the campaign.

On CNN’s The Situation Room, Paul Begala mentioned “hateful” things said about gays by the Rev. James Meeks, founder and senior pastor of Salem Baptist Church of Chicago, and an Obama supporter. Meeks has made no bones about his firm opposition to homosexuality (and abortion), which is one of the reasons he’s very close to many of the nation’s white conservative pastors (I know him well; I’m a member of Salem).

And we all remember the hoopla over gospel singer Donnie McClurkin when he was included on a gospel concert tour around South Carolina for Obama. McClurkin has preached that homosexuals can be converted to heterosexuals, and that set off a firestorm.

But Clinton also has her own issues with anti-gay pastoral supporters.

The Rev. Harold Mayberry, pastor of the First African Methodist Church in Oakland, has voiced for years his opposition to homosexuality. In fact, some have said he has compared homosexuality to thievery.

When Clinton received the support of Mayberry, her campaign touted his endorsement, sans any mention of his anti-gay rants.

She has also received a $1,000 contribution from Bishop Eddie L. Long of the mega-church New Birth Missionary Baptist Church in Lithonia, Ga., who previously led an anti-gay march in Atlanta.

And the Rev. Floyd Flake, senior pastor of Greater Allen Cathedral of New York in Jamaica, N.Y., and a former congressman, supporter the Federal Marriage Amendment, seen by many as anti-gay.

Of course, when it comes to McCain, it wouldn’t be a story if his ministerial supporters are anti-gay. It would be news if any of them actually supported homosexuality!

The bottom line: everyone has an association that is open for scrutiny. Our real focus should be on the candidate and their views on the issues on the day because they will be the only one to stand before the nation and take the oath of office and swear to uphold and protect the Constitution of the United States.

March 24, 2008

Kilpatrick says he will not resign and will be exonerated on perjury, obstruction of justice charges

Detroit Mayor Kwame Kilpatrick said just a few moments ago that he will not resign, and expects to be fully exonerated after being hit earlier in the morning with a 12-count indictment, along with his former chief of staff Christine Beatty.

Kilpatrick said he's "deeply disappointed in the prosecutor's decision."

"I can't say that I that am surprised, however. This has been a very flawed process from the very beginning."

Kilpatrick said he is guaranteed under the U.S. Constitution to be seen as innocent until proven guilty.

I look forward to complete exoneration," he said, adding, "I will remain focused on moving this city forward with the key initiatives that we've laid out before you."

The attorney for Kilpatrick issued a vigorous denial of the facts outlined in a 12-count indictment today, saying he is ready to proceed to trial immediately.

Attorney Dan Webb, a top defense attorney from Chicago, said he wants to go before a jury and "let that jury speak and make a decision."

He also said that he "strongly advised" the mayor not to resign, saying he is "entitled to his day in court."

Question of the Day: Should Detroit Mayor Kwame Kilpatrick resign his position?

Detroit Mayor Kwame Kilpatrick to be prosecuted for perjury

Detroit Mayor Kwame Kilpatrick and his former chief of staff, Christine Beatty, were hit this morning with a 12-count indictment by Wayne County Prosecutor Kym Worthy for their involvement in a text message scandal.

The city of Detroit has been turned upside down over this whole issue, which started with the firing of Gary Brown, former deputy chief of the police department, who was investigating claims made by one of his officers.

Kilpatrick and Beatty denied, under oath, that they had ever discussed firing Brown, but text messages uncovered between the two told a different story.


The two also lied that they were involved in a sexual affair, but the same text messages pointed to a torrid affair between the two of them.

Kilpatrick is expected to hold his own news conference in the next 30 minutes.

Chris Matthews: America is still segregated

Pretty interesting discussion from MSNBC's Chris Matthews. He shocks Joe Scarborough that he didn't have an African American in school from kindergarten through graduate school in college. And he went to schools in the North!

Husband of Corinne Bailey Rae found dead

Condolences go out to this talented sister.

According to People.com, "The husband of British soul singer Corinne Bailey Rae was found dead in an apartment in Leeds, England, the BBC reports.

"A spokesman for West Yorkshire Police said officers were called to the home where they found saxophonist Jason Rae, 31, Saturday afternoon.

"In connection with the case, a 32-year-old man was arrested on suspicion of supplying controlled drugs, and was since released on bail, according to police."

Click here to read more.


White anti-racist educator drops it!

Folks, I love talking to folks from various backgrounds - conservative, liberal, Republican, Democrat - and Tim Wise is one of them.

We first met when we did a show in Beaumont, Texas, on racism when Paula Zahn had her show on CNN.

I'm going to be posting audio of our discussion from my radio show later today, but here is some of his column on the Obama-Rev. Jeremiah Wright controversy that is brilliant.

Of National Lies and Racial Amnesia:
Jeremiah Wright, Barack Obama, and the Audacity of Truth

By Tim Wise

March 18, 2008

For most white folks, indignation just doesn't wear well. Once affected or conjured up, it reminds one of a pudgy man, wearing a tie that may well have fit him when he was fifty pounds lighter, but which now cuts off somewhere above his navel and makes him look like an idiot.

Indignation doesn't work for most whites, because having remained sanguine about, silent during, indeed often supportive of so much injustice over the years in this country--the theft of native land and genocide of indigenous persons, and the enslavement of Africans being only two of the best examples--we are just a bit late to get into the game of moral rectitude. And once we enter it, our efforts at righteousness tend to fail the test of sincerity.

But here we are, in 2008, fuming at the words of Pastor Jeremiah Wright, of Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago--occasionally Barack Obama's pastor, and the man whom Obama credits with having brought him to Christianity--for merely reminding us of those evils about which we have remained so quiet, so dismissive, so unconcerned. It is not the crime that bothers us, but the remembrance of it, the unwillingness to let it go--these last words being the first ones uttered by most whites it seems whenever anyone, least of all an "angry black man" like Jeremiah Wright, foists upon us the bill of particulars for several centuries of white supremacy.

But our collective indignation, no matter how loudly we announce it, cannot drown out the truth. And as much as white America may not be able to hear it (and as much as politics may require Obama to condemn it) let us be clear, Jeremiah Wright fundamentally told the truth.

Oh I know that for some such a comment will seem shocking. After all, didn't he say that America "got what it deserved" on 9/11? And didn't he say that black people should be singing "God Damn America" because of its treatment of the African American community throughout the years?

Well actually, no he didn't.

Wright said not that the attacks of September 11th were justified, but that they were, in effect, predictable. Deploying the imagery of chickens coming home to roost is not to give thanks for the return of the poultry or to endorse such feathered homecoming as a positive good; rather, it is merely to note two things: first, that what goes around, indeed, comes around--a notion with longstanding theological grounding--and secondly, that the U.S. has indeed engaged in more than enough violence against innocent people to make it just a tad bit hypocritical for us to then evince shock and outrage about an attack on ourselves, as if the latter were unprecedented.

He noted that we killed far more people, far more innocent civilians in Hiroshima and Nagasaki than were killed on 9/11 and "never batted an eye." That this statement is true is inarguable, at least amongst sane people. He is correct on the math, he is correct on the innocence of the dead (neither city was a military target), and he is most definitely correct on the lack of remorse or even self-doubt about the act: sixty-plus years later most Americans still believe those attacks were justified, that they were needed to end the war and "save American lives."

But not only does such a calculus suggest that American lives are inherently worth more than the lives of Japanese civilians (or, one supposes, Vietnamese, Iraqi or Afghan civilians too), but it also ignores the long-declassified documents, and President Truman's own war diaries, all of which indicate clearly that Japan had already signaled its desire to end the war, and that we knew they were going to surrender, even without the dropping of atomic weapons. The conclusion to which these truths then attest is simple, both in its basic veracity and it monstrousness: namely, that in those places we committed premeditated and deliberate mass murder, with no justification whatsoever; and yet for saying that I will receive more hate mail, more hostility, more dismissive and contemptuous responses than will those who suggest that no body count is too high when we're the ones doing the killing. Jeremiah Wright becomes a pariah, because, you see, we much prefer the logic of George Bush the First, who once said that as President he would "never apologize for the United States of America. I don't care what the facts are."

And Wright didn't say blacks should be singing "God Damn America." He was suggesting that blacks owe little moral allegiance to a nation that has treated so many of them for so long as animals, as persons undeserving of dignity and respect, and which even now locks up hundreds of thousands of non-violent offenders (especially for drug possession), even while whites who do the same crimes (and according to the data, when it comes to drugs, more often in fact), are walking around free. His reference to God in that sermon was more about what God will do to such a nation, than it was about what should or shouldn't happen. It was a comment derived from, and fully in keeping with, the black prophetic tradition, and although one can surely disagree with the theology (I do, actually, and don't believe that any God either blesses or condemns nation states for their actions), the statement itself was no call for blacks to turn on America. If anything, it was a demand that America earn the respect of black people, something the evidence and history suggests it has yet to do.

Click here to read the rest of Tim's column.

March 22, 2008

Wallace, Kilmeade not happy with Fox and Friends for two hours of Obama bashing

Have you guys seen this video?

Chris Wallace, the Sunday anchor for Fox News Channel, smacked down his colleagues at the network's morning show, Fox and Friends, for what he called "two hours of Obama bashing."

Just watch all three of them twist and turn in their chair as Wallace refuses to go along with their line of thinking.

And watch the face of Gretchen Carlson. She was ticked at Wallace!

Fox and Friends co-host Brian Kilmeade clearly was ticked off with his co-anchors. And he got up and walked off the set!


Why didn't Hannity blast Jack Kemp about his praise for Farrakhan?

Any time Sean Hannity discusses Sen. Barack Obama, he always brings up the praise of Rev. Jeremiah Wright for Nation of Islam Minister Louis Farrakhan.

Any time a fire-breathing person who is white comes on, he lets them rip Obama, Wright and Farrakhan. Any time he gets a black critic of Obama, he lets them rip on him, Wright and Farrakhan. And any time he has a supporter of Obama, he rips into them on Wright and Farrakhan, trying to make them denounce both.

So why last night DIDN'T Hannity rip into his buddy, former Republican Congressman Jack Kemp and ardent Sen. John McCain supporter, for his words of praise for the Nation of Islam and Farrakhan?

Oh, you guys didn't know about that, right?

Well, way back in 1996, Kemp was the vice presidential running mate of Kansas Sen. Bob Dole.

Kemp said that he wanted to meet with Farrakhan; praised their focus on economic empowerment, family values and the pull-yourselves-up-by-the-bootstrap-message - which is right in line with the GOP talking points; and even said he wanted to speak at the Million Man March.

Boy, was he torn apart by Jewish critics, and many in his own party.

Kemp summarily criticized Farrakhan's comments about Jews and whites, but he didn't take his words back.

So again, WHY didn't Hannity ask Kemp about these comments? Is it because he didn't want his mostly white and mostly Republican audience to know that one of their own highly respected leaders has praised Farrakhan?

The issue here isn't about defending Obama, Wright or Farrakhan. It's about the SELECTIVE memory of Hannity, who is nothing but a foaming-at-the-mouth terrier who can't even present the facts straight.

So, Sean, WHY won't you denounce, condemn and repudiate your buddy Jack Kemp for HIS comments about Farrakhan?

I know Hannity hates the fact that guys like me know how to read and we have a memory. So as long as he keeps going with his distorted reality, we'll be sure to remind him of the truth.

March 21, 2008

Jack Kemp pimp slaps Sean Hannity over Rev. Wright, Obama drama!

I had to run out of my apartment to do my live hit on CNN's AC360, but folks, tonight's show of Hannity & Colmes was a hot one!

The top guest was Jack Kemp, former congressman and the vice presidential running mate of Sen. Bob Dole in 1996.

He is a big supporter of Sen. John McCain and they were mostly discussing him and the polls showing him tied or leading Sens. Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton.

But as usual, Sean Hannity couldn't resist himself and he had to question Kemp about the controversy surrounding Obama's former pastor, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright.

Hannity was his usual foaming at the mouth self, but Kemp wouldn't take the bait. In fact, he sounded more like an Obama supporter! Kemp said Obama denounced the comments by Wright; that he didn't believe Obama holds the same views as Obama; and that you can hold him accountable for something someone he knows says. 

Sean kept bird-doggin' him, but Kemp was having NONE of it. At one point, it looked like Kemp was going to get up and leave, telling Hannity, "I"m not going round and round with you on this, Sean."

Hannity looked like a wounded, spoiled brat who got smacked across the face by his dad for not getting his way.

The show re-airs at 11 p.m. CST, and you gotta check it out.

When I finish with CNN, I'll pull the transcript and try to get the video. It's MUST SEE TV!

UPDATE Here's the video!

Roland to discuss Wright's sermons tonight on AC360 at 10 pm EST!

We'll discuss my breakdown of both sermons, which you can listen to right here on my blog!

Listen to Rev. Jeremiah Wright's 'God Damn America' sermon


powered by ODEO

The full story behind Wright’s 'God Damn America' sermon

I just finished listening to the nearly 40-minute sermon Rev. Jeremiah Wright gave on April 13, 2003, titled, “Confusing God and Government.”

For those of us watching and listening to the media in the last week, it is better known as the “God Damn America” sermon.

Wright’s scriptural focus was Luke 19:37-44 (reading from the New Revised Standard Version).

In this sermon, Wright spoke about the military rule during biblical days, led by Pontius Pilate. It was clear, through his language, such as “occupying military brigade” that he was making an analogy to the war in Iraq.

“War does not make for peace,” he said. “Fighting for peace is like raping for virginity.

“War does not make for peace. War only makes for escalating violence and a mindset to pay the enemy back by any means necessary,” he said.

He then gets to the thesis of his sermon, saying, “y’all looking to the government for only what God can give. A lot of people confuse God with their government.”

Wright criticizes the Bush administration and it supporters for using Godly language to justify the war in Iraq. He equates using God in America as condoning the war in Iraq to the same perspective of Islamic fundamentalists.

“We can see clearly the confusion in the mind of a few Muslims, and please notice I did not say all Muslims, I said a few Muslims, who see Allah as condoning killing and killing any and all who don’t believe what they don’t believe. They call it jihad. We can see clearly the confusion in their minds, but we cannot see clearly what it is that we do. We call it crusade when we turn right around and say that our God condones the killing of innocent civilians as a necessary means to an end. WE say that God understand collateral damage. We say that God knows how to forgive friendly fire.

“We say that God will bless the shock and awe as we take over unilaterally another country, calling it a coalition because we’ve got three guys from Australia, going against the United Nations, going against the majority of Christians, Muslims and Jews throughout the world, making a pre-emptive strike in the name of God. We cannot see how what we are doing is the same thing is the same thing that Al-Qaeda is doing under a different color flag – calling on the name of a different God to sanction and approve our murder and our mayhem.”

He continues on his thesis of equating government with our God, saying that God sent the early settlers to America to take the country from Native Americans; ordained slavery; and that “we believe that God approves of 6 percent of the people on the face of this earth controlling all of the wealth on the face of this earth while the other 94 percent live in poverty and squalor while we give millions of tax breaks to the white rich.”

He also criticizes the “lily white” G-7 nations for controlling the world’s capital.

Then Wright speaks to:

1. Governments lie. “This government lied about their belief that all men were created equal. The truth is they believed that all white men were created equal. The truth is they did not even believe that white women were created equal, in creation nor civilization. The government had to pass an amendment to the Constitution to get white women the vote. Then the government had to pass an equal rights amendment to get equal protection under the law for women. The government still thinks a woman has no rights over her own body, and between Uncle Clarence (Thomas), who sexually harassed Anita Hill, and a closeted Klan court, that is a throwback to the 19th century, handpicked by Daddy Bush, Ronald Reagan, Gerald Ford, between Clarence and that stacked court, they are about to un-do Roe vs. Wade, just like they are about to un-do affirmative action. The government lied in its founding documents and the government is still lying today. Governments lie.”

“The government lied about Pearl Harbor. They knew the Japanese were going to attack. Governments lie. The government lied about the Gulf of Tonkin. They wanted that resolution to get us in the Vietnam War. Governments lie. The government lied about Nelson Mandela and our CIA helped put him in prison and keep him there for 27 years. The South African government lied on Nelson Mandela. Governments lie.

“The government lied about the Tuskegee experiment. They purposely infected African American men with syphilis. Governments lie. The government lied about bombing Cambodia and Richard Nixon stood in front of the camera, ‘Let me make myself perfectly clear…” Governments lie. The government lied about the drugs for arms Contra scheme orchestrated by Oliver North, and then the government pardoned all the perpetrators so they could get better jobs in the government. Governments lie.

“The government lied about inventing the HIV virus as a means of people of color. Governments lie. The government lied about a connection between Al Qaeda and Saddam Hussein and a connection between 9.11.01 and Operation Iraqi Freedom. Governments lie.

“The government lied about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq being a threat to the United States peace. And guess what else? If they don’t find them some weapons of mass destruction, they gonna do just like the LAPD, and plant the some weapons of mass destruction. Governments lie.

2. Governments change. He said long before the United States colonized the world, so did Egypt.

“All colonizers are not white. Turn to your neighbors and say that oppressors come in all colors.”

He then went back to the Bible and spoke about the changing of kings in Babylonia.

“Prior to Abraham Lincoln, the government in this country said it was legal to hold African in slavery in perpetuity...when Lincoln got in office, the government changed. Prior to the passing of the 13th, 14th and 15th amendments to the Constitution, government defined African as slaves, as property. Property, people with no rights to be respected by any whites anywhere. The Supreme Court of the government, same court, granddaddy of the court that stole the 2000 election. Supreme court said in it’s Dred Scott decision in the 1850s, no African anywhere in this country has any rights that any white person has to respect at any place, any time. That was the government’s official position backed up by the Supreme Court – that’s the judiciary; backed up by the executive branch – that’s the president; backed up by the legislative branch and enforced by the military of the government. But I stop by to tell you tonight that government’s change.

“Prior to Harry Truman’s government, the military was segregated. But governments change.

“Prior to the Civil Rights and equal accommodation laws of the government in this country, there was backed segregation by the country, legal discrimination by the government, prohibited blacks from voting by the government, you had to eat and sit in separate places by the government, you had sit in different places from white folks because the government said so, and you had to buried in a separate cemetery. It was apartheid, American style, from the cradle to the grave, all because the government backed it up.

“But guess what? Governments change. Under Bill Clinton, we got a messed up welfare to work bill, but under Clinton blacks had an intelligent friend in the Oval Office. Oh, but governments change.

“The election was stolen. We went from an intelligent friend to a dumb Dixiecrat. A rich Republican who has never held a job in his life; is against affirmative action (and) against education – I guess he is; against healthcare, against benefits for his own military, and gives tax breaks to the wealthiest contributors to his campaign. Governments change. Sometimes for the good, and sometimes for the bad.”

“Where governments change, God does not change. God is the same yesterday, today and forever more. That’s what his name I Am means. He does not change.

God was against slavery on yesterday, and God, who does not change, is still against slavery today. God was a God of love yesterday, and God who does not change, is still a God of love today. God was a God of justice on yesterday, and God who does not change, is still a God of justice today.

“God does not change.”

3. He then speaks of the government in his Bible text and said the Romans failed. Then he said the British government failed even after it colonized the world. He said the Russian government failed. The Japanese government failed. The German government failed.

“And the United States of America government, when it came to treating her citizens of Indian descent, she failed. She put them on reservations.

“When it came to putting her citizens of Japanese descent fairly, she failed. She put them in interment prison camps.

“When it came to putting the citizens of African descent fairly, America failed. She put them in chains. The government put them on slave quarters. Put them on auction blocks. Put them in cotton fields. Put them in inferior schools. Put them in substandard housing. Put them scientific experiments. Put them in the lower paying jobs. Put them outside the equal protection of the law. Kept them out of their racist bastions of higher education, and locked them into positions of hopelessness and helplessness.

“The government gives them the drugs, builds bigger prisons, passes a three strike law and then wants us to sing God Bless America. Naw, naw, naw. Not God Bless America. God Damn America! That’s in the Bible. For killing innocent people. God Damn America for treating us citizens as less than human. God Damn America as long as she tries to act like she is God and she is Supreme.

“The United States government has failed the vast majority of her citizens of African descent. Think about this. Think about this. For every one Oprah, a billionaire, you’ve got 5 million blacks that are out of work. For every one Colin Powell, a millionaire, you’ve got 10 million blacks who cannot read. For every one Condi-Skeezer Rice, you’ve got 1 million in prison. For every one Tiger Woods, who needs to get beat at the Masters, with his Cablanasian hips, playing on a course that discriminates against women, God has this way of brining you up short when you get to big for your Cablanasian britches. For every one Tiger Woods, we’ve got 10,000 black kids who will never see a golf course. The United States government has failed the vast majority of her citizens of African descent.”

“Tell your neighbor he’s (going to) help us one last time. Turn back and say forgive him for the God Damn, that’s in the Bible though. Blessings and curses is in the Bible. It’s in the Bible.”

Where government fail, God never fails. When God says it, it’s done. God never fails. When God wills it, you better get out the way, ‘cause God never fails. When God fixes it, oh believe me it’s fixed. God never fails. Somebody right now, you think you can’t make it, but I want you to know that you are more than a conqueror through Christ. You can do all things through Christ who strengthens you.”

He then went on to talk about the salvation of Christians through the death of Jesus Christ. The sermon ended with a song proclaiming, “God never fails.”

Listen to Rev. Jeremiah Wright's 9/11 sermon

It has been discussed around the nation. So what EXACTLY did Rev. Jeremiah Wright of Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago say in the aftermath of the devastation on Sept. 11, 2001?

This sermon was delivered on Sept. 16, 2001 and is titled, "The Day of Jerusalem's Fall." Note that the "chickens coming home to roost" comment was attributed not to Wright but former Ambassador to the Iraq, Edward Peck. It comes around the 20-minute mark.

The point that I have always made as a journalist is that our job is to seek the truth, and not the partial truth.

I am also listening to the other sermons delivered by Rev. Wright that have been the subject of controversy.

And let me be clear: Where I believe he was wrong and not justified in what he said based upon the facts, I will say so. But where the facts support his argument, that will also be said.


powered by ODEO

March 20, 2008

Roland on CNN tonight at 7 pm CST

I'll be on Election Center with Campbell Brown tonight. Guess what? We're talking Rev. Jeremiah Wright!

The truth behind Rev. Jeremiah Wright's 9/11 sermon

As this whole sordid episode has played out over the last week regarding the sermons of the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, I wanted to understand what he ACTUALLY said in this speech. I've been saying all week on CNN that context is important, and I just wanted to know what the heck is going on.

I actually listened to the sermon Rev. Wright gave after September 11 titled, "The Day of Jerusalem's Fall." It was delivered on Sept. 16, 2001.

One of the most controversial statements in this sermon was when he mentioned "chickens coming home to roost." He was actually quoting Edward Peck, former US Ambassador to Iraq and deputy director of President Reagan's terrorism task force, who was speaking on FOX NEWS. That's what he told the congregation. He was quoting Peck as saying that America's foreign policy has put the nation in peril.

"We took this country by terror away from the Sioux, the Apache, araw, The Comanche, the Arapaho, the Navajo. Terrorism.

"We took Africans away from their country to build our way of ease and kept them enslaved and living in fear. Terrorism.

"We bombed Grenada and killed innocent civilians, babies, non-miliatry personnel.

"We bombed the black civilian community of Panama with stealth bombers and killed unarmed teenage and toddlers, pregnant mothers and hard working fathrs.

"We bombed Qadafi's home, and killed his child. Blessed are they who bash your children's head against the rock.

"We bombed Iraq. we killed unarmed civilians trying to make a living. We bombed a plant in Sudan to pay back for the attack on our embassy, killed hundreds of hard working people, mothers and fathers who left home to go that day not knowing that they'd never get back home.

"We bombed Hiroshima. we bombed Nagasaki, and we nuked far more than teh thousands in New York and the Pentagon and we never batted an eye.

"Kids playing in the playground. Mothers picking up children after school. Civilians, not soldiers, people just trying to make it day by day.

"We have supported state terrorism against the Palestinians and black South Africans, and now we are indignant because the stuff that we have done overseas is now brought right back into our own front yards. America's chickens are coming home to roost.

"Violence begets violence. Hatred begets hatred. And terrorism begets terrorism. A white ambassador said that y'all, not a black militant. Not a reverend who preaches about racism. An ambassador whose eyes are wide open and who is trying to get us to wake up and move away from this dangerous precipice upon which we are now poised. The ambassador said the people we have wounded don't have the military capability we have. but they do have individuals who are willing to die and take thousands with them. And we need to come to grips with that."

He went on to describe seeing the photos of the aftermath of 9/11 because he was in Newark, N.J. when the planes struck. After turning on the TV and seeing the second plane slam into one of the twin towers, he spoke passionately about what if you never got a chance to say hello to your family again.

"What is the state of your family?" he asked.

And then he told his congregation that he loved them and asked the church to tell each other they loved themselves.

His sermon thesis:

1. This is a time for self-examination of ourselves and our families.

2. This is a time for social transformation (then he went on to say they won't put me on PBS or national cable for what I'm
about to say. Talk about prophetic!)

"We have got to change the way we have been doing things as a society," he said.

Wright then said we can't stop messing over people and thinking they can't touch us. He then said we may need to declare war on racism, injustice and greed, instead of war on other countries.

"Maybe we need to declare war on AIDS. In five minutes the Congress found $40 billion to rebuild New York and the families that died in sudden death, do you think we can find the money to make medicine available for people who are dying a slow death? Maybe we need to declare war on the nation's healthcare system that leaves the nation's poor with no health coverage? Maybe we need to declare war on the mishandled educational system and provide quality education for everybody, every citizen, based on their ability to learn, not their ability to pay. This is a time for social transformation."

3. This is time to tell God thank you for all that he has provided and that he gave him and others another chance to do His will.

By the way, no where in this sermon did he said "God damn America." I'm not sure which sermon that came from.

This doesn't explain anything away, nor does it absolve Wright of using the N-word, but what it does do is add an accurate perspective to this conversation.

The point that I have always made as a journalist is that our job is to seek the truth, and not the partial truth.

I am also listening to the other sermons delivered by Rev. Wright that have been the subject of controversy.

And let me be clear: Where I believe he was wrong and not justified in what he said based upon the facts, I will say so. But where the facts support his argument, that will also be said.

So stay tuned.

New York Times: Clinton using Wright against Obama to Dem superdelegates

While Sen. Barack Obama tries to put the test regarding comments made by his pastor behind him, the campaign of Sen. Hillary Clinton is desperately trying to argue to Democratic superdelegates that the fiery words of the Rev. Jeremiah Wright will cost him in the fall election.

A story in today's New York Times by Adam Nagourney reveals the strategy as part of Clinton's last chance to overtake Obama to win the Democratic nomination.

Is Sean Hannity man enough to debate me?

Its been an absolute trip watching Sean Hannity foam at the mouth on his radio show and TV show over Sen. Barack Obama and his former pastor, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright.

What amazes me is how he continues to toss all kinds of nonsense out, and no one corrects him.

Now, Hannity really tries to hold himself up as a big-time Christian, but I have doubts about that. Oh, yea, I said it. If you listen to his hateful talk, then he doesn't walk the walk.

I think the real issue is that Sean Hannity and the conservative blowhards are absolutely afraid of Obama. They have absolutely NO LOVE for Sen. John McCain, and when they don't have anyone to love, they need someone to hate.

And their hate has turned to Sen. Barack Obama.

When I listen to Hannity, Rush Limbaugh and the rest of the Conservative Cabal, they claim to be defenders of truth and honesty, yet they are strangely silent - VERY SILENT - when their own conservative preachers make some of the most outlandish comments.

This is not about defending Rev. Wright or Sen. Obama. It's about defending the First Amendment, the goodness of an individual, but most of all, the truth.

So, I'm issuing this challenge to you. Ask Sean Hannity why he won't honor his own word to have me on his show. That's what he told me at the Radio Hall of Fame when we met in 2006. When he heard I had done Bill O'Reilly's show on nearly a dozen occasions, he said, "Well we've got to have you on my show!"

So, Sean, what say you? Are you willing to debate someone who isn't afraid of you? are you willing to debate someone who isn't gonig to back down from you?

You claim to be a Christian. I'm a Christian. Let's have a REAL discussion about the church - black and white. Let's have a REAL discussion about race in America - black and white. Let's have a real discussion about the issues of the day - in black and white.

You keep quoting the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., but you don't LIVE the dream. Maybe you do. Let's start with a conversation.

Time to man up, Sean!

March 19, 2008

Hannity to go after another black pastor from Chicago

It looks like right wing conservative TV and radio talk show host Sean Hannity continues his efforts to tar and feather Sen. Barack Obama by condemning another African American pastor from Chicago.

His next target is the Rev. James Meeks, an Illinois state senator and senior pastor of Salem Baptist Church, the second-largest church in the state (By the way, I'm a member of the church).

Hannity appears to be upset with Meeks going off on the mayor of Chicago and governor of Illinois for their refusal to change how schools are funded.

Watch a WBBM-TV/Ch. 2 story on the issue.

One of Salem's major initiatives is racial healing, and they have partnered with Willow Creek, the largest church in the state, which is predominantly white.

But also check out the efforts Salem has undertaken to alter the Roseland community, an economically depressed area on the South Side of Chicago.

Here is a Fox News Channel story on Salem Baptist Church members giving out gas cards. By the way, many of the people who accepted the cards also accepted Jesus Christ as their Lord and Savior.

Clarence Thomas strikes again

This dude is amazing.

He derides affirmative action, and then President George H.W. Bush names him to succeed the iconic Justice Thurgood Marshall, knowing full well he wasn't the best available choice.

But check out this ruling.

The Supreme Court ruled today 7-2 to toss out a murder conviction in Louisiana because a prosecutor kept blacks off the jury.

Who were the two? Thomas and Antonin Scalia.

Why did Thomas vote that way? According to the Associated Press, "Thomas said he would not 'second-guess' the judge."

Isn't that the purpose of the Supreme Court, to re-examine the rulings of judges to ensure they are fair?

Click here to read the story.

Roland talks with Georgia Congressman John Lewis

We talked today on my WVON-AM/Chicago radio show.


powered by ODEO

Roland talks with Harvard Law Professor Charles Ogletree

We talked today on my WVON-AM/Chicago show today.


powered by ODEO

March 18, 2008

View Sen. Barack Obama's race speech from Philadelphia

Obama Urges Everyone to Face the Man in the Mirror

Sen. Barack Obama has made it clear that is candidacy for president is not about the color of his skin but the content of his character.

That character was questioned when excerpts of sermons by his pastor, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, we're played online, on radio and TV. Hit with the racial inflammatory comments, Obama responded, but had to go further in a speech on race and politics in America.
      
That character was clear when, speaking from the cradle of democracy in Philadelphia, Obama didn't just respond to the comments by Rev. Wright, he also laid bare America's racial past, and how it has permeated every facet ofour society.
      
But he didn't just stop there. Obama spoke to our desire to address our own racial animosities, whether black, white, Asian, Hispanic or Native American.
      
The challenges we face aren't just about what a pastor said, but what we as a nation wil do to ensure that in the 21st century, race, as defined by Dr. W.E.B. DuBois, isn't America's defining issue, as it was in the 20th century.

Remarks of Senator Barack Obama

Remarks of Senator Barack Obama
“A More Perfect Union”
Constitution Center
Tuesday, March 18th, 2008
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
             
“We the people, in order to form a more perfect union.”
             
Two hundred and twenty one years ago, in a hall that still stands across the street, a group of men gathered and, with these simple words, launched America’s improbable experiment in democracy.  Farmers and scholars; statesmen and patriots who had traveled across an ocean to escape tyranny and persecution finally made real their declaration of independence at a Philadelphia convention that lasted through the spring of 1787.
             
The document they produced was eventually signed but ultimately unfinished.  It was stained by this nation’s original sin of slavery, a question that divided the colonies and brought the convention to a stalemate until the founders chose to allow the slave trade to continue for at least twenty more years, and to leave any final resolution to future generations.
             
Of course, the answer to the slavery question was already embedded within our Constitution – a Constitution that had at is very core the ideal of equal citizenship under the law; a Constitution that promised its people liberty, and justice, and a union that could be and should be perfected over time.
             
And yet words on a parchment would not be enough to deliver slaves from bondage, or provide men and women of every color and creed their full rights and obligations as citizens of the United States.  What would be needed were Americans in successive generations who were willing to do their part – through protests and struggle, on the streets and in the courts, through a civil war and civil disobedience and always at great risk - to narrow that gap between the promise of our ideals and the reality of their time.
             
This was one of the tasks we set forth at the beginning of this campaign – to continue the long march of those who came before us, a march for a more just, more equal, more free, more caring and more prosperous America.  I chose to run for the presidency at this moment in history because I believe deeply that we cannot solve the challenges of our time unless we solve them together – unless we perfect our union by understanding that we may have different stories, but we hold common hopes; that we may not look the same and we may not have come from the same place, but we all want to move in the same direction – towards a better future for of children and our grandchildren.
             
This belief comes from my unyielding faith in the decency and generosity of the American people.  But it also comes from my own American story.
             
I am the son of a black man from Kenya and a white woman from Kansas.  I was raised with the help of a white grandfather who survived a Depression to serve in Patton’s Army during World War II and a white grandmother who worked on a bomber assembly line at Fort Leavenworth while he was overseas.  I’ve gone to some of the best schools in America and lived in one of the world’s poorest nations.  I am married to a black American who carries within her the blood of slaves and slaveowners – an inheritance we pass on to our two precious daughters.  I have brothers, sisters, nieces, nephews, uncles and cousins, of every race and every hue, scattered across three continents, and for as long as I live, I will never forget that in no other country on Earth is my story even possible.
             
It’s a story that hasn’t made me the most conventional candidate.  But it is a story that has seared into my genetic makeup the idea that this nation is more than the sum of its parts – that out of many, we are truly one.
             
Throughout the first year of this campaign, against all predictions to the contrary, we saw how hungry the American people were for this message of unity.  Despite the temptation to view my candidacy through a purely racial lens, we won commanding victories in states with some of the whitest populations in the country.  In South Carolina, where the Confederate Flag still flies, we built a powerful coalition of African Americans and white Americans.
             
This is not to say that race has not been an issue in the campaign.  At various stages in the campaign, some commentators have deemed me either “too black” or “not black enough.”  We saw racial tensions bubble to the surface during the week before the South Carolina primary.  The press has scoured every exit poll for the latest evidence of racial polarization, not just in terms of white and black, but black and brown as well.
             
And yet, it has only been in the last couple of weeks that the discussion of race in this campaign has taken a particularly divisive turn.
             
On one end of the spectrum, we’ve heard the implication that my candidacy is somehow an exercise in affirmative action; that it’s based solely on the desire of wide-eyed liberals to purchase racial reconciliation on the cheap.  On the other end, we’ve heard my former pastor, Reverend Jeremiah Wright, use incendiary language to express views that have the potential not only to widen the racial divide, but views that denigrate both the greatness and the goodness of our nation; that rightly offend white and black alike.
             
I have already condemned, in unequivocal terms, the statements of Reverend Wright that have caused such controversy.  For some, nagging questions remain.  Did I know him to be an occasionally fierce critic of American domestic and foreign policy?  Of course.  Did I ever hear him make remarks that could be considered controversial while I sat in church?  Yes.  Did I strongly disagree with many of his political views?  Absolutely – just as I’m sure many of you have heard remarks from your pastors, priests, or rabbis with which you strongly disagreed.
             
But the remarks that have caused this recent firestorm weren’t simply controversial.  They weren’t simply a religious leader’s effort to speak out against perceived injustice.  Instead, they expressed a profoundly distorted view of this country – a view that sees white racism as endemic, and that elevates what is wrong with America above all that we know is right with America; a view that sees the conflicts in the Middle East as rooted primarily in the actions of stalwart allies like Israel, instead of emanating from the perverse and hateful ideologies of radical Islam.
             
As such, Reverend Wright’s comments were not only wrong but divisive, divisive at a time when we need unity; racially charged at a time when we need to come together to solve a set of monumental problems – two wars, a terrorist threat, a falling economy, a chronic health care crisis and potentially devastating climate change; problems that are neither black or white or Latino or Asian, but rather problems that confront us all.
             
Given my background, my politics, and my professed values and ideals, there will no doubt be those for whom my statements of condemnation are not enough.  Why associate myself with Reverend Wright in the first place, they may ask?  Why not join another church?  And I confess that if all that I knew of Reverend Wright were the snippets of those sermons that have run in an endless loop on the television and You Tube, or if Trinity United Church of Christ conformed to the caricatures being peddled by some commentators, there is no doubt that I would react in much the same way
             
But the truth is, that isn’t all that I know of the man.  The man I met more than twenty years ago is a man who helped introduce me to my Christian faith, a man who spoke to me about our obligations to love one another; to care for the sick and lift up the poor.  He is a man who served his country as a U.S. Marine; who has studied and lectured at some of the finest universities and seminaries in the country, and who for over thirty years led a church that serves the community by doing God’s work here on Earth – by housing the homeless, ministering to the needy, providing day care services and scholarships and prison ministries, and reaching out to those suffering from HIV/AIDS.
             
In my first book, Dreams From My Father, I described the experience of my first service at Trinity:
             
“People began to shout, to rise from their seats and clap and cry out, a forceful wind carrying the reverend’s voice up into the rafters….And in that single note – hope! – I heard something else; at the foot of that cross, inside the thousands of churches across the city, I imagined the stories of ordinary black people merging with the stories of David and Goliath, Moses and Pharaoh, the Christians in the lion’s den, Ezekiel’s field of dry bones.  Those stories – of survival, and freedom, and hope – became our story, my story; the blood that had spilled was our blood, the tears our tears; until this black church, on this bright day, seemed once more a vessel carrying the story of a people into future generations and into a larger world.  Our trials and triumphs became at once unique and universal, black and more than black; in chronicling our journey, the stories and songs gave us a means to reclaim memories that we didn’t need to feel shame about…memories that all people might study and cherish – and with which we could start to rebuild.”
             
That has been my experience at Trinity.  Like other predominantly black churches across the country, Trinity embodies the black community in its entirety – the doctor and the welfare mom, the model student and the former gang-banger.  Like other black churches, Trinity’s services are full of raucous laughter and sometimes bawdy humor.  They are full of dancing, clapping, screaming and shouting that may seem jarring to the untrained ear.  The church contains in full the kindness and cruelty, the fierce intelligence and the shocking ignorance, the struggles and successes, the love and yes, the bitterness and bias that make up the black experience in America.
             
And this helps explain, perhaps, my relationship with Reverend Wright.  As imperfect as he may be, he has been like family to me.  He strengthened my faith, officiated my wedding, and baptized my children.  Not once in my conversations with him have I heard him talk about any ethnic group in derogatory terms, or treat whites with whom he interacted with anything but courtesy and respect.  He contains within him the contradictions – the good and the bad – of the community that he has served diligently for so many years.
             
I can no more disown him than I can disown the black community.  I can no more disown him than I can my white grandmother – a woman who helped raise me, a woman who sacrificed again and again for me, a woman who loves me as much as she loves anything in this world, but a woman who once confessed her fear of black men who passed by her on the street, and who on more than one occasion has uttered racial or ethnic stereotypes that made me cringe.
             
These people are a part of me.  And they are a part of America, this country that I love.
             
Some will see this as an attempt to justify or excuse comments that are simply inexcusable. I can assure you it is not.  I suppose the politically safe thing would be to move on from this episode and just hope that it fades into the woodwork.  We can dismiss Reverend Wright as a crank or a demagogue, just as some have dismissed Geraldine Ferraro, in the aftermath of her recent statements, as harboring some deep-seated racial bias.
             
But race is an issue that I believe this nation cannot afford to ignore right now.  We would be making the same mistake that Reverend Wright made in his offending sermons about America – to simplify and stereotype and amplify the negative to the point that it distorts reality.
             
The fact is that the comments that have been made and the issues that have surfaced over the last few weeks reflect the complexities of race in this country that we’ve never really worked through – a part of our union that we have yet to perfect.  And if we walk away now, if we simply retreat into our respective corners, we will never be able to come together and solve challenges like health care, or education, or the need to find good jobs for every American.
             
Understanding this reality requires a reminder of how we arrived at this point.  As William Faulkner once wrote, “The past isn’t dead and buried.  In fact, it isn’t even past.”  We do not need to recite here the history of racial injustice in this country.  But we do need to remind ourselves that so many of the disparities that exist in the African-American community today can be directly traced to inequalities passed on from an earlier generation that suffered under the brutal legacy of slavery and Jim Crow.
             
Segregated schools were, and are, inferior schools; we still haven’t fixed them, fifty years after Brown v. Board of Education, and the inferior education they provided, then and now, helps explain the pervasive achievement gap between today’s black and white students.
             
Legalized discrimination - where blacks were prevented, often through violence, from owning property, or loans were not granted to African-American business owners, or black homeowners could not access FHA mortgages, or blacks were excluded from unions, or the police force, or fire departments – meant that black families could not amass any meaningful wealth to bequeath to future generations.  That history helps explain the wealth and income gap between black and white, and the concentrated pockets of poverty that persists in so many of today’s urban and rural communities.
             
A lack of economic opportunity among black men, and the shame and frustration that came from not being able to provide for one’s family, contributed to the erosion of black families – a problem that welfare policies for many years may have worsened.  And the lack of basic services in so many urban black neighborhoods – parks for kids to play in, police walking the beat, regular garbage pick-up and building code enforcement – all helped create a cycle of violence, blight and neglect that continue to haunt us.
             
This is the reality in which Reverend Wright and other African-Americans of his generation grew up.  They came of age in the late fifties and early sixties, a time when segregation was still the law of the land and opportunity was systematically constricted.  What’s remarkable is not how many failed in the face of discrimination, but rather how many men and women overcame the odds; how many were able to make a way out of no way for those like me who would come after them.
             
But for all those who scratched and clawed their way to get a piece of the American Dream, there were many who didn’t make it – those who were ultimately defeated, in one way or another, by discrimination.  That legacy of defeat was passed on to future generations – those young men and increasingly young women who we see standing on street corners or languishing in our prisons, without hope or prospects for the future.  Even for those blacks who did make it, questions of race, and racism, continue to define their worldview in fundamental ways.  For the men and women of Reverend Wright’s generation, the memories of humiliation and doubt and fear have not gone away; nor has the anger and the bitterness of those years.  That anger may not get expressed in public, in front of white co-workers or white friends.  But it does find voice in the barbershop or around the kitchen table.  At times, that anger is exploited by politicians, to gin up votes along racial lines, or to make up for a politician’s own failings.

And occasionally it finds voice in the church on Sunday morning, in the pulpit and in the pews.  The fact that so many people are surprised to hear that anger in some of Reverend Wright’s sermons simply reminds us of the old truism that the most segregated hour in American life occurs on Sunday morning.  That anger is not always productive; indeed, all too often it distracts attention from solving real problems; it keeps us from squarely facing our own complicity in our condition, and prevents the African-American community from forging the alliances it needs to bring about real change.  But the anger is real; it is powerful; and to simply wish it away, to condemn it without understanding its roots, only serves to widen the chasm of misunderstanding that exists between the races.
             
In fact, a similar anger exists within segments of the white community.  Most working- and middle-class white Americans don’t feel that they have been particularly privileged by their race.  Their experience is the immigrant experience – as far as they’re concerned, no one’s handed them anything, they’ve built it from scratch.  They’ve worked hard all their lives, many times only to see their jobs shipped overseas or their pension dumped after a lifetime of labor.  They are anxious about their futures, and feel their dreams slipping away; in an era of stagnant wages and global competition, opportunity comes to be seen as a zero sum game, in which your dreams come at my expense.  So when they are told to bus their children to a school across town; when they hear that an African American is getting an advantage in landing a good job or a spot in a good college because of an injustice that they themselves never committed; when they’re told that their fears about crime in urban neighborhoods are somehow prejudiced, resentment builds over time.
             
Like the anger within the black community, these resentments aren’t always expressed in polite company.  But they have helped shape the political landscape for at least a generation.  Anger over welfare and affirmative action helped forge the Reagan Coalition.  Politicians routinely exploited fears of crime for their own electoral ends.  Talk show hosts and conservative commentators built entire careers unmasking bogus claims of racism while dismissing legitimate discussions of racial injustice and inequality as mere political correctness or reverse racism.
             
Just as black anger often proved counterproductive, so have these white resentments distracted attention from the real culprits of the middle class squeeze – a corporate culture rife with inside dealing, questionable accounting practices, and short-term greed; a Washington dominated by lobbyists and special interests; economic policies that favor the few over the many.  And yet, to wish away the resentments of white Americans, to label them as misguided or even racist, without recognizing they are grounded in legitimate concerns – this too widens the racial divide, and blocks the path to understanding.
             
This is where we are right now.  It’s a racial stalemate we’ve been stuck in for years.  Contrary to the claims of some of my critics, black and white, I have never been so naïve as to believe that we can get beyond our racial divisions in a single election cycle, or with a single candidacy – particularly a candidacy as imperfect as my own.
             
But I have asserted a firm conviction – a conviction rooted in my faith in God and my faith in the American people – that working together we can move beyond some of our old racial wounds, and that in fact we have no choice is we are to continue on the path of a more perfect union.
             
For the African-American community, that path means embracing the burdens of our past without becoming victims of our past.  It means continuing to insist on a full measure of justice in every aspect of American life.  But it also means binding our particular grievances – for better health care, and better schools, and better jobs - to the larger aspirations of all Americans -- the white woman struggling to break the glass ceiling, the white man whose been laid off, the immigrant trying to feed his family.  And it means taking full responsibility for own lives – by demanding more from our fathers, and spending more time with our children, and reading to them, and teaching them that while they may face challenges and discrimination in their own lives, they must never succumb to despair or cynicism; they must always believe that they can write their own destiny.
             
Ironically, this quintessentially American – and yes, conservative – notion of self-help found frequent expression in Reverend Wright’s sermons.  But what my former pastor too often failed to understand is that embarking on a program of self-help also requires a belief that society can change.
             
The profound mistake of Reverend Wright’s sermons is not that he spoke about racism in our society.  It’s that he spoke as if our society was static; as if no progress has been made; as if this country – a country that has made it possible for one of his own members to run for the highest office in the land and build a coalition of white and black; Latino and Asian, rich and poor, young and old -- is still irrevocably bound to a tragic past.  But what we know -- what we have seen – is that America can change.  That is true genius of this nation.  What we have already achieved gives us hope – the audacity to hope – for what we can and must achieve tomorrow.
             
In the white community, the path to a more perfect union means acknowledging that what ails the African-American community does not just exist in the minds of black people; that the legacy of discrimination - and current incidents of discrimination, while less overt than in the past - are real and must be addressed.   Not just with words, but with deeds – by investing in our schools and our communities; by enforcing our civil rights laws and ensuring fairness in our criminal justice system; by providing this generation with ladders of opportunity that were unavailable for previous generations.  It requires all Americans to realize that your dreams do not have to come at the expense of my dreams; that investing in the health, welfare, and education of black and brown and white children will ultimately help all of America prosper.
             
In the end, then, what is called for is nothing more, and nothing less, than what all the world’s great religions demand – that we do unto others as we would have them do unto us.  Let us be our brother’s keeper, Scripture tells us.  Let us be our sister’s keeper.  Let us find that common stake we all have in one another, and let our politics reflect that spirit as well.
             
For we have a choice in this country.  We can accept a politics that breeds division, and conflict, and cynicism.  We can tackle race only as spectacle – as we did in the OJ trial – or in the wake of tragedy, as we did in the aftermath of Katrina - or as fodder for the nightly news.  We can play Reverend Wright’s sermons on every channel, every day and talk about them from now until the election, and make the only question in this campaign whether or not the American people think that I somehow believe or sympathize with his most offensive words.  We can pounce on some gaffe by a Hillary supporter as evidence that she’s playing the race card, or we can speculate on whether white men will all flock to John McCain in the general election regardless of his policies.
             
We can do that.
             
But if we do, I can tell you that in the next election, we’ll be talking about some other distraction.  And then another one.  And then another one.  And nothing will change.
             
That is one option.  Or, at this moment, in this election, we can come together and say, “Not this time.”  This time we want to talk about the crumbling schools that are stealing the future of black children and white children and Asian children and Hispanic children and Native American children.  This time we want to reject the cynicism that tells us that these kids can’t learn; that those kids who don’t look like us are somebody else’s problem.  The children of America are not those kids, they are our kids, and we will not let them fall behind in a 21st century economy.  Not this time.
             
This time we want to talk about how the lines in the Emergency Room are filled with whites and blacks and Hispanics who do not have health care; who don’t have the power on their own to overcome the special interests in Washington, but who can take them on if we do it together.
             
This time we want to talk about the shuttered mills that once provided a decent life for men and women of every race, and the homes for sale that once belonged to Americans from every religion, every region, every walk of life.  This time we want to talk about the fact that the real problem is not that someone who doesn’t look like you might take your job; it’s that the corporation you work for will ship it overseas for nothing more than a profit.
             
This time we want to talk about the men and women of every color and creed who serve together, and fight together, and bleed together under the same proud flag.  We want to talk about how to bring them home from a war that never should’ve been authorized and never should’ve been waged, and we want to talk about how we’ll show our patriotism by caring for them, and their families, and giving them the benefits they have earned.
             
I would not be running for President if I didn’t believe with all my heart that this is what the vast majority of Americans want for this country.  This union may never be perfect, but generation after generation has shown that it can always be perfected.  And today, whenever I find myself feeling doubtful or cynical about this possibility, what gives me the most hope is the next generation – the young people whose attitudes and beliefs and openness to change have already made history in this election.
             
There is one story in particularly that I’d like to leave you with today – a story I told when I had the great honor of speaking on Dr. King’s birthday at his home church, Ebenezer Baptist, in Atlanta.
             
There is a young, twenty-three year old white woman named Ashley Baia who organized for our campaign in Florence, South Carolina.  She had been working to organize a mostly African-American community since the beginning of this campaign, and one day she was at a roundtable discussion where everyone went around telling their story and why they were there.
             
And Ashley said that when she was nine years old, her mother got cancer.  And because she had to miss days of work, she was let go and lost her health care.  They had to file for bankruptcy, and that’s when Ashley decided that she had to do something to help her mom.
             
She knew that food was one of their most expensive costs, and so Ashley convinced her mother that what she really liked and really wanted to eat more than anything else was mustard and relish sandwiches.  Because that was the cheapest way to eat.
             
She did this for a year until her mom got better, and she told everyone at the roundtable that the reason she joined our campaign was so that she could help the millions of other children in the country who want and need to help their parents too.
             
Now Ashley might have made a different choice.  Perhaps somebody told her along the way that the source of her mother’s problems were blacks who were on welfare and too lazy to work, or Hispanics who were coming into the country illegally.  But she didn’t.  She sought out allies in her fight against injustice.
             
Anyway, Ashley finishes her story and then goes around the room and asks everyone else why they’re supporting the campaign.  They all have different stories and reasons.  Many bring up a specific issue.  And finally they come to this elderly black man who’s been sitting there quietly the entire time.  And Ashley asks him why he’s there.  And he does not bring up a specific issue.  He does not say health care or the economy.  He does not say education or the war.   He does not say that he was there because of Barack Obama.  He simply says to everyone in the room, “I am here because of Ashley.”
             
“I’m here because of Ashley.”  By itself, that single moment of recognition between that young white girl and that old black man is not enough.  It is not enough to give health care to the sick, or jobs to the jobless, or education to our children.
             
But it is where we start.  It is where our union grows stronger.  And as so many generations have come to realize over the course of the two-hundred and twenty one years since a band of patriots signed that document in Philadelphia, that is where the perfection begins.

March 17, 2008

Conservative talkers want to keep Obama-Wright feud going

Sorry I haven't been able to post anything on this topic today. I have been absolutely swamped doing radio and TV interviews over the continuing saga over comments made from the pulpit by the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, the retiring senior pastor of Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago.

One of the reasons this story continues to go on and on is primarily because the conservative media - those rabid right wingers on TV and radio - so desperately want this to continue.

Why?

Because they know their candidate, Sen. John McCain, is lukewarm among the party faithful, and they desperately need to take down the Democratic frontrunnner, Sen. Barack Obama.

Some media folks have said that this all started with a report by Brian Ross on ABC. True, the broadcasting of racially charged comments were first reported by ABC, but the person who has been riding shotgun on this for more than a year is Sean Hannity, who hosts a nationally syndicated radio show and is the co-host of Hannity & Colmes on Fox News Channel.

Ever since his super-charged debate with Wright last year, Hannity has had his eyes locked on Obama, blasting him for every little comment.

So when the tapes of Wright preaching came to light, Hannity was like a kid in a candy store.

Now, the Obama campaign should have clearly known that this was going to be a problem. Last year, the drama was about Trinity's Black Value System. Hannity was foaming at the mouth on this one, even though he and other conservative talkers have decried the so-called lack of morals and values in black America. Here is a church that advances a value system and these nut jobs lose it.

But knowing full well that Wright has always been a tough talker in the pulpit, the Obama campaign - or Wright himself - should have not been put on his African American pastoral committee. This has nothing to do with not loving or supporting your pastor. This is called the reality of politics. You lessen any potential fallout and minimize the damage.

Not doing so has cost the Obama camp immensely. Last Monday, he was down 12 points in the polls in Pennsylvania. He wins Mississippi, the flap involving Geraldine Ferraro comes out, then this at the end of the week, and now he's down 16 points. Don't think for a second that those white voters in rural Pennsylvania weren't paying attention.

But this is also about largely white America being clueless about what happens in black America. There is nothing that Wright has said that I have not heard tons of times in black churches. In fact, I've heard wild comments made by white pastors!

In fact, Sen. John McCain has had to deal with some of his faith supporters making controversial statements and being confronted by them. Pastors John Hagee and Rod Parsley have been on the firing line, but certainly not to the degree as Wright.

But folks, the real deal is that NONE of this means a hill of beans if you are about to lose your home. It means nothing to the 14,000 folks at Bear Stearns who are likely to lose their job after they were sold after seeing the company stock price go from $70 to $2 in a week. And it will do NOTHING for the thousands of war veterans returning from Iraq who don't have a job.

This is all hype and drama that sells papers and gets folks to watch TV.

Let's just call it what it is.

March 16, 2008

One hilarious roller coaster video!

So we've got lots of craziness on the campaign trail, so I figure I might as well show you something funny to take your mind off the battles of race and gender.

Check out my niece, Ana - nickname is Ana Bird because she used to flap her arms in the air when we would to toss her in the air when she was younger - and her eyes rolling back in her head as the coaster takes off at Great America in Illinois.

This girl is a trooper. We jumped on one ride and she was too small, and she was in tears. She is an absolute roller coaster lover!

Enjoy!


March 14, 2008

Obama responds to criticism of his pastor, Rev. Jeremiah Wright

This was just posted on The Huffington Post:

Barack Obama: On My Faith and My Church

The pastor of my church, Rev. Jeremiah Wright, who recently preached his last sermon and is in the process of retiring, has touched off a firestorm over the last few days. He's drawn attention as the result of some inflammatory and appalling remarks he made about our country, our politics, and my political opponents.

Let me say at the outset that I vehemently disagree and strongly condemn the statements that have been the subject of this controversy. I categorically denounce any statement that disparages our great country or serves to divide us from our allies. I also believe that words that degrade individuals have no place in our public dialogue, whether it's on the campaign stump or in the pulpit. In sum, I reject outright the statements by Rev. Wright that are at i