« Eugene Robinson blasts Clinton for naked appeal to white voters | Main | Grey's Anatony pimps Isaiah Washington one mo' time »

May 09, 2008

Tubbs-Jones, Meek continue to insist that Clinton is better for Dems at the top of the ticket

CNN estimates that Sen. Barack Obama needs 170 delegates to clinch the Democratic nomination. They say Sen. Hillary Clinton needs 334. And with the remaining states having a combined 217 delegates, that leaves 266 superdelegates to poop or get off the pot.

As a result, Clinton continues to insist that she's the better candidate at the top of the ticket, even though the voters in her own party flat out disagree. Yet the Clinton surrogates, including Congressional Black Caucus members, Reps. Stephanie Tubbs-Jones of Ohio, and Kendrick Meek of Florida, joined 10 others in writing the following letter:

SWING STATE DEMOCRATS SAY HILLARY BEST FOR TOP OF TICKET

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
May 9, 2008
 
Dear Fellow Democrat,
 
We are writing to you because of our shared belief in our Party’s principles and our commitment to ensuring that we have the strongest possible nominee to lead our ticket against John McCain and the Republicans in November.
 
The decision about who to support to be our Party’s nominee is not one that any of us should take lightly.  We haven’t.  But, after giving this important decision a great deal of thought, we are convinced that Hillary Clinton has the vision, skills and commitment to make the changes our country needs.  As Democrats who have run and won in competitive Congressional districts and battleground states, we believe that Hillary is best positioned to successfully lead the Democratic ticket in districts and states like ours around the country. 
 
As you know, Hillary has racked up victories in bellwether states like Ohio, Pennsylvania and now Indiana that are absolutely vital to winning the White House and maintaining our Congressional majority in the fall.  Hillary has won the big battleground states by connecting with voters whose support we must have to win the general election.  Her victories in Pennsylvania and Indiana were all the more impressive after being outspent by as much as two or three to one.
 
Pennsylvania was not just a victory for Hillary Clinton.  It was also a wake- up call for superdelegates, forcing us to ask ourselves two essential questions: 1) Which candidate can carry the magic 270 electoral votes to win in the fall? 2) Which candidate is most likely to help our fellow Democrats in down-ballot races?  We believe the answer to both of these questions is Hillary Clinton.
 
On the first question, Hillary has shown she can win the all-important battleground states like Ohio, Pennsylvania and Florida even while being outspent. This speaks to her ability to connect with voters we must deliver in the fall, including blue collar Democrats who can sway this election as they have in the past. 
 
On the second question, Hillary has won rural and suburban districts which we as Democrats must carry to maintain our edge in Congress.  Of the fifteen districts rated “toss up” by the Cook Political Report, Hillary has now won ten.  Of the 20 districts we picked up in 2006 that had gone for President Bush just two years before, Hillary has now won 16.  She is strong in the places we must win to hold and expand our majority.
 
This is a historically close race.  The candidates are separated by a mere percentage point or two and the path to victory for each candidate is the same: win in the upcoming states and secure enough pledged and automatic delegates to get to the number required to win the nomination.
 
The race now turns to the remaining six contests where the focus will be squarely on the economy.  Voters in our states and across the country are voting on issues that affect them, their communities and their children’s future.  We believe that they will decide that Hillary is the candidate who best understands those issues and has the best solutions to address them.
 
We Democrats are justifiably proud of both of our candidates, and if Senator Obama is our Party’s nominee, we will enthusiastically support him.  But our responsibility is not to choose simply to support the eventual nominee; it is to help select the nominee who is best for our party and best for our country.  Our choice is clear: Hillary Clinton is that candidate.  We believe she should be your choice as well. 
 
Thank you for consideration.
 
Sincerely,
 
Rep. Michael Arcuri (NY-24)
Rep. Shelley Berkley (NV-01)
Rep. Marion Berry (AR-1)
Rep. Henry Cuellar (TX-28)
Rep. Kirsten Gillibrand (NY-20)
Rep. Gene Green (TX -29)
Rep. John Hall (NY-19)
Rep. Darlene Hooley (OR-5)
Rep. Kendrick B. Meek (FL-17)
Rep. Stephanie Tubbs Jones (OH-11)
Rep. Silvestre Reyes (TX-16)
Rep. Mike Ross (AR-4)
Rep. Joe Sestak (PA-8)
Rep. Ike Skelton (MO-4)
Rep. John Tanner (TN-8)
Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (FL-20)

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/801072/28927608

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Tubbs-Jones, Meek continue to insist that Clinton is better for Dems at the top of the ticket:

Comments

Those people who signed the letter are ediots. No wonder democrats cannot get anything done in Washington these days.

Hillary won PA because the Governor there supported her. If Obama had the full support of the Governor and the Mayor of Philadelphia, he would have won the state.

Further, that Hillary won PA in the primary does not mean and can never mean that Obama will not win the state in general election.

No matter what those morons plot, Hillary will never be nominated. If they nominate her by stealing this nomination, then democrats will not win another election in the next 20 years.

Hmmmm...what about the fact that Obama won some of THEIR states (NV, TX, MO, and likely OR in a few weeks)?

Roland,

Okay, we got some more political dummies that would find it perfectly fine for the Dems to take the nomination from the person who rightfully earned it by playing by the rules (winning the most states, most votes, most pledged delegates and raised the most money, not to mention increased the number of new Dems into the party) and give it to the person who came in second, essentially telling the voters that we know what is best for you. Your voting was just an exercise in futility. Do these folks really want to win the White House come November? What have the Clinton's promised these bozos if they were to get the nomination and win in November?

Now I am from Ohio and used to live in Congresswoman Tubbs-Jones district and thought that she had more political sense than to do something as dumb as this, well I guess I was wrong. The people in her district need to think long and hard about re-electing her the next time she runs for Congress.

If the situation was reversed, would we see the same type of actions coming from the Dems allowing Sen. Obama to "play out the string" of remaining contests? I think not!

Please answer this question: Why have we not heard about Hillary and Bill's pastor William Procanick? Was he not sentenced to jail for a crime against a young child? Why is this been out of the newspapers and other media?Did Press Club friends of Bill and Hillary contact or book Rev Wright? I know he did not have to accept. And who is this movie mogul Weinstein threaten Rep Polosi if she does not get the Florida and Michigan vote done, he and or others will not give money to democrats. Weinstein is a Hillary supporter.

We need unity among Democrats now. Obama will get the nomination and the White House despite these last minute attempts to put Hillary at the top unless the party falls apart.

Hillary cracked under pressure with regard to her white America comment. Plain and simple. Her ambition beat out her morals. It will be something she has to contend with for the rest of her days. The Clintons have done some real good over the years, and the diehard Black supporters are, dare I say, "clinging" to that fact to remain loyal which has very clear meaning in the world of Washington politics.

In fact, she is not the one who voted against the MLK, Jr Holiday. That was Mr. McCain, and his recent apology was politically motivated, if he weren't running we never would have heard it. Please let's not lose sight of that, as well as the fact that there is not a single Black republican in the House or Senate.

If some of her Black supporters want to continue to back her candidacy at this late date, perhaps they are striving for unity in their own way. It would only serve McCain to have the party seem totally racially polarized.

Yet another example of a BLACK ON BLACK CRIME!

Are you sure General Custer didn't sign that letter?

Anyway, Bill also jumps on people in West Virginia that disagree...check it out.


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/05/09/bill-clintons-angry-confr_n_100972.html#comments

This is a joke, right? This letter is as pathetic as those who authored it.

"But our responsibility is not to choose simply to support the eventual nominee; it is to help select the nominee who is best for our party and best for our country. Our choice is clear: Hillary Clinton is that candidate. We believe she should be your choice as well".

What the hell kind of comment is that? This gives new meaning to "Operation Chaos".
Now let's see why they are so pathetically desperate.

Obama picked up the backing of nine superdelegates.

The American Federation of Government Employees announced its support for Obama. The union claims about 600,000 members who work in the federal and Washington, D.C., governments.

Obama has Hillary Clinton beat in both the delegate count, Obama leads with 1,859.5 delegates, to 1,697 for Clinton.
Obama is just 165.5 delegates short of the 2,025 delegates needed to win it. and the popular vote.

Hillary leads in the superdelegate count 271.5 to Obama's 271. Little more than four months ago, on the eve of the primary season, she held a lead of 169-63.

Her chances of catching up in the six remaining primaries and caucuses are virtually nil. Fewer than 500 pledged and superdelegates remain in play, and by accepted estimates she would have to pick up 70 percent of them to become the nominee. Obama needs just 38 percent.

Benjamin Franklin said it best: Tricks and treachery are the practice of fools, that don't have brains enough to be honest.

I am so tempted to send another email to Laura Richardson, the Congresswoman from the 37th District of CA, who endorsed Hillary Clinton, and ask her how she feels about Clinton's strategy to marginalize the African American voters in the Democratic Party. I've decided not to waste my time, as I'm sure that email will go unanswered the same as my previous email to her stating that Barack won our District and asking her to consider switching her alliance. Three prominent AA Congresswomen in the Los Angeles Area have endorsed Clinton.....Maxine Waters, Diane Watson, and Laura Richardson. All of their districts voted overwhelmingly for Barack. I think our AA elected officials that are still supporting Clinton after she has made it clear that she intends to steal the nomination from Barack based on the premise that hard working white folks in WV, KY, OH, and PA won't vote for him; owe their constituents an explanation for their continued loyalty to Clinton.

Make no mistake about it...by the time this process is over there are going to be a great many of Hillary Clinton supporters feeling ashamed of the fact that they supported someone who has so little regard for herself or anyone else!

Crabs

Okay, can I throw up now? This letter is preposterous.

Talk about being brain washed and clueless.

Simplycharming47: Your post had me rolling. So true...So true.

I bet if you go and look at their voting records, they have votes against a lot of things that could actually help their Black communities. But because they have safe predominately Black districts, where there are many uneducated people,they pimp them. Smile in their faces, and stab them in their backs.

I thought we had smarter leaders than this. First of all, a year ago Hillary Clinton had it all, including a whopping majority of the African-American vote (remember?). For all her wisdom and political skill she blew it with an ill-advised campaign strategy boasting experience when voters wanted change. Look where we are today with all the experience in Washington. Little was accomplished that really benefitted the average American, not to mention the poor. Lately her embrace of the gas tax showed that she'll stoop to gimmickry instead of real solutions. People are tired of that. Administration of her campaign in terms of fundraising, staffing choices, strategy, accurate perception of what the public outcry really means, leaves her leadership ability in real question. Loyalty is great, but how do you move the country with a shoddy operation?

Her triumphs in the areas mentioned started only after her 'kitchen sink' tactics which did more to suggest an unprincipled power-grabbing mentality that produced votes and wins. However, it did nothing to transform her into the gifted, focused, above-the-fray leader her opponent proved himself to be. The letter even mentions my state of Florida. She, along with every other Dem candidate, signed on to the DNC's position penalizing the state for illegaly moving their date earlier, then all of a sudden when she's starts losing wants to change the rules back.

Finally she met her match. Barack Obama has transformed the electoral process by his well run campaign and he will do the same as president.

This should get out in the local Black newspapers in their towns. Clinton must have bought and paid for these people.

Rep. Michael Arcuri (NY-24)
Rep. Shelley Berkley (NV-01)
Rep. Marion Berry (AR-1)
Rep. Henry Cuellar (TX-28)
Rep. Kirsten Gillibrand (NY-20)
Rep. Gene Green (TX -29)
Rep. John Hall (NY-19)
Rep. Darlene Hooley (OR-5)
Rep. Kendrick B. Meek (FL-17)
Rep. Stephanie Tubbs Jones (OH-11)
Rep. Silvestre Reyes (TX-16)
Rep. Mike Ross (AR-4)
Rep. Joe Sestak (PA-8)
Rep. Ike Skelton (MO-4)
Rep. John Tanner (TN-8)
Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (FL-20

The problem I have with this is the above people can sleep at night and feel good about the decision to take the nomination away from the person that has won it. How can your mind and heart reconcile this? Again, it's the politics of the old versus what the possibilities of the future can bring.

This election process is a big revellation for me.
Some Black people in US Congress have shown their true true color - the enemies of the black race.

Some Black people in the media have also shown that they are against the advancement of the black man. This is the first time I have seen a Black woman in the media showing her true hate for the black race. Carol Simpson (she used to work to CNN) has shown that she is brainless animal. She was on CNN's Larry King.

She said that her 40 years of reporting tells her that anything can happen in politics. She says white people will go into the polling boots and will remember God Damn America and will not vote for Obama.

Reverse racism and racism are the only means left for Hillary. Hillary is doing a good job using many black men and women to try to destroy Obama. They will all fail because Hillary is not going anywhere.

The interesting thing here is that these people want a backroom coup de e'tat in spite of the fact that Obama has won on all numerical indicators. They want them to just give it to Hillary, in spite of the numbers.

What is also interesting is Hillary's CBC supporters who are NOT on the list. Does this mean there is some softening, and that they will soon be coming over like Payne?

People who live in these CBC districts needs to apply some pressure.

I noticed that Shelia Jackson-Lee's name is not on the list of CBC members who are requesting that Hillary Clinton be "given" the Democratic nomination. I blog on a black website. On May 7, 2008, I posted the following blog entry:

My Open Letter to Congresswoman Shelia Jackson-Lee

Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee on May 14, 2007, the Clinton Campaign announced your endorsement of Senator Clinton for President. Staff of her campaign named you National Campaign Co-Chair and Gulf States Regional Co-Chair.

In your endorsement of Senator Clinton you stated, ”I am pleased today to endorse Hillary Rodham Clinton for President. Senator Clinton has a great love for America and has a deep understanding of the issues that face our nation. I look forward to having a strategic role in the campaign and helping this dedicated public servant become the next President of the United States”

I truly admire you Congresswoman Sheila Jackson-Lee and your determination to keep your promise to Hillary. Please counsel your dear friend and tell her to end her valiant quest for the Oval Office. We can’t wait for two more weeks and/or six more primary contests. The urgency is now. If Hillary refuses to end her candidacy please endorse Senator Obama today and help unite this party.

It’s time to embrace and endorse Senator Barack Obama as the Democratic nominee of our great party. It is his time to run for the Presidency. He has won more states, more popular votes, and more delegates.

I am very passionate in my support for Senator Obama. I believe in my heart that this is a divine time for Obama and this country. We all know that our God works in mysterious ways. God has given all of us free will. I hope and pray that the people in power will not let greed and the need for more power cause us to self-destruct as a democracy and as a nation.

As a nation we united after we were attacked by al-Qaeda led by Osama bin Laden on September 11, 2001. Therefore, we know that it is possible for this country to unite again.

Congresswoman Lee you know that the American people voted for change during the 2006 election. Unfortunately Congress has been unable to deliver that change.

Barack Obama is the change agent that we need to make positive changes for all Americans. Under the leadership of President Barack Obama this country will once again stand united as one nation under God.

Vera Richardson author of “A Case of Racial Discrimination and Retaliation Real or Imagined.”


To Simplycharming47, Roland Martin and all the African American voters who put these hankerchief heads in office. Please print this letter and hang it in a prominent place in your homes so that when it is time for them to be re-elected, show them how you can put a hispanic, asian or white person in office. They should be ashamed of themselves. How do they feel with Billary refering to the fact that she can rely on the white women and middle class whites to get her a win? Who are they chopped liver? More than that, when its time to vote for them please show them how you feel. The term, "I CAN SHOW YOU BETTER THAN I CAN TELL YOU" should play a big part in this.
I live in FL and when it is time to re-elect the brother who is supporting her, I will know his name by then and he will not get my vote. And I have a big mouth and will definetly encourage others to show him how it feels to have his own people turn against him.

Also have you noticed how many times they have referred to the fact that "should a disaster happen to Obama" she will be there to pick up the reigns. Am I the only one who thinks that they are hinting to some fool to go out and assisinate Obama? The Clintons will stop at nothing to get what they want. I do believe that if anything should happen to him, they will be behind it.

***"Pennsylvania was not just a victory for Hillary Clinton. It was also a wake- up call for superdelegates, forcing us to ask ourselves two essential questions: 1) Which candidate can carry the magic 270 electoral votes to win in the fall? 2) Which candidate is most likely to help our fellow Democrats in down-ballot races? We believe the answer to both of these questions is Hillary Clinton."***

Well, I hope that North Carolina was a wake-up call for the SD's and Hillary Clinton too. And she barely won Indiana with less then 1 percentage point. Hillary needs to go home and take her medicine.

http://www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/99999999/NEWS05/80326049

What post has Senator Clinton promised to her to keep saying the things that she is saying. Tubbs better check to make sure that Clinton has not offered the same post to someone else.

What is even more disturbing is this letter came out AFTER Mrs. Clinton's troubling comments to the USA Today. Here are excerpts from an interesting column by Derrick Z. Jackson of The Boston Globe:

Clinton's Diminishing of Black Voters

IN HER long, sad self-diminution to being merely a white candidate for subsegments of white people, Hillary Clinton claimed to USA Today this week, "I have a much broader base to build a winning coalition on." Clinton exploited an Associated Press poll to say how "Senator Obama's support among working, hard-working Americans, white Americans, is weakening again and how whites in both states who had not completed college were supporting me . . . There's a pattern emerging here."

This was on top of Democratic strategist and Clinton supporter Paul Begala saying this week on CNN, "We cannot win with eggheads and African-Americans. OK. That's the Dukakis coalition, which carried 10 states and gave us four years of the first George Bush. President Clinton, you know, reached across and got a whole lot of Republicans and independents to come."

Yet here is Clinton dancing all over stereotypes. There is no way you can say in the same sentence, "hard-working Americans, white Americans," without diminishing black Americans as lazy.

Can you imagine the Jeremiah Wright-level furor if Obama turned Begala's words upside down and said: "We cannot win with the working class and white people. OK. That's the Reagan coalition?"

The truth is that Clinton is in denial about one of the key reasons for her slide from inevitability. She choked on the black vote. Conveniently forgotten in her reinvention in Pennsylvania as Rocky Balboa (who conveniently was a white working-class boxer trying to beat down a black champion), is that this white woman led Obama in an October 2007 CNN poll, 68 percent to 25 percent among black women and was nearly dead even with Obama among black men.

The problem for Clinton is that this is another case in which her math does not add up. Yes, every voter the Democrats can get their hands on is critical. But all this talk about Obama not connecting with salt of the earth white folks cynically forgets that white leaders in the Democratic Party have not solved this problem since Jimmy Carter's 48 percent of the white vote in 1976, yet want to make Obama the poster child for it despite his multi-racial crowds and record turnouts of voters. In the late throes of her insurgency, to borrow from Dick Cheney, Clinton is playing "divide and doubt" about Obama getting "only" 37 percent of the white vote in North Carolina and Pennsylvania and 40 percent in Indiana.

But in a year in which Republican enthusiasm is in doubt with a bad war and a bummer economy, it must be remembered that Bill Clinton won the presidency in 1992 in three-way races with a grand total of 39 percent of the white vote and 83 percent of the black vote and 61 percent of the Hispanic vote and besting the first President Bush and Ross Perot among all age groups.

Full column: http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2008/05/10/clintons_diminishing_of_black_voters/


History and facts do not appear to be in use much at the Clinton campaign.

These people on this list, need to turn to Hillary and tell her its over. They should not be willing to walk over the cliff with her. Since they are close to her, they have a responsbility to help her make the transition and not destroy the Clinton legacy, the party, our chances of winning the election, and ultimately destroy the country. They were elected to lead, now do you job.

I listened to the exchange between Brazile and Paul Begala on CNN in which Begala made the statement: "We cannot win with eggheads and African-Americans. OK. That's the Dukakis coalition, which carried 10 states and gave us four years of the first George Bush. President Clinton, you know, reached across and got a whole lot of Republicans and independents to come."

Compare this attitude to the behavior of Hillary in the Ohio debate in which Hillary pressed Obama to reject and denounce Farrakhan on behalf of the Jewish population in USA. Compare to the situation in Texas in which Hillary used an old Mexican woman to state that no Hispanic will vote for a black man. Compare to the fact that Mexicans and Asians in California refused to vote for Obama.

Did you notice a pattern and why the pattern? I will not say all I want to say here until the election is over. Here some questions concerning Jewish bias:

What is the population of the Jewish people in USA compared to the population of African-Americans?

What is the population of African immigrants compared to Jewish immigrants in USA?

Why is it that the Jews are respected, protected, and appealed to while the blacks are used as the dumping ground in every election in USA?

How many Jewish people are in top positions in Hillary’s? How many are in top positions in Obama’s campaign?

How come we hear nothing from McCain or Hillary or Obama about the need to defend and protect and give military and economic aids to African nations as a pretext for getting elected while Israel is always at the center of the discussions for these things? Talk to Stephanie Tubbs Jones, Kendrick B. Meek, Charles Rangel, Andrew Young, Bob Johnson, Pastor James Manning, or to Shelia Jackson-Lee. They will all inform you about the need to defend and protect and give military and economic aids to Israel; but they will be ASHAMED to mention the same about African nations. Israel is about 6 million in population. Nigeria ALONE is about 160 million people strong. If the crude oil from Nigeria does not flow into USA, you will pay $50 per gallon for gas for your car; Israel has no such a critical resource to offer for US economy. Why this blatant disregard and disrespect for African nations with more to offer to America than Israel?

Bill Clinton Switches to Obama!

In what some Democratic Party insiders are calling a particularly ominous sign for Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign, former president Bill Clinton today became the latest superdelegate to switch from Sen. Clinton to her rival, Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill).

Sources close to the former president said that Mr. Clinton had been mulling such a defection for weeks, as early as the night of the Iowa primary, but that he only decided to make his decision public today.

“The American people want change,” Mr. Clinton said at a press conference in New York. “Lord knows I do.”

The former president said that “sometimes, at the end of a race, you have to put an old horse down,” adding, “I’m not speaking metaphorically.”

Mr. Clinton fueled speculation that he was seeking a role in an Obama administration, saying, “I know my way around the Oval Office, and I know how the super-secret double-lock works.”

The former president said he would relish a return to the White House, calling his tenure there “good times.”

For her part, Sen. Clinton said that the defection of her husband would not deter her from staying in the race, adding, “To my knowledge, he’s the only white voter Sen. Obama has.”

The New York senator denied that she was playing the race card, arguing, “Every other member of my family is supporting me, and by the way, they’re white.”

Elsewhere, a defiant John McCain said that his wife will not release her tax returns, “and neither will my girlfriend.”

http://www.borowitzreport.com /

You know what the people on the letter are really saying to us? They are saying we should be allowed to steal the nomination because some white people will not vote for Obama because he is black. Everyone should roll over to please white people. Here is the question we should ask them, if not now then when? Let's face it some white people will NEVER vote for a black person no matter who the person is, no matter what the person brings to the table. There is a word for this it's call RACISM! Our lives should not be placed on the back burner because some white people will not vote vote for a black person. Instead of signing this letter, why are the blacks not questioning Hilliary's pandering to the whites? If she were a true leader, she should make it clear that she does not want anyone to vote for her just because she is White which is clearly what is going on in some cases. Instead she boasts about it as though that is something to be proud of. When in fact what we are seeing is the ignorance of some.

Wow...that's impressive! A whopping 16 superdelegates signed a letter supporting Hillary and claiming she's the stronger nominee. Gee...it would seem that the real way to prove that you're better to win the general election is to WIN THE PRIMARY.

What a load of crap! If she can't beat Obama with all of the advantages she had in this race how can she claim an edge up on McCain? Bottom line is she should've won--PERIOD. No one would have even entertained Obama this long and yet the party still continues to humor her. It is time to SHUT THIS THING DOWN--NOW!

Nothing about Kendrick Meek surprises me and the "I don't want to be Black" Debbie Wasserman Schultz look rather dumb in this situation. Kendrick got to his position on the coattails of his Mom, Carrie. I hope the African-American community will remember these two when re-election time rolls around. To say that a White woman is better positioned to be president even though the Black man has won fairly in his bid makes absolutely no sense at all to me. HRC will go to any length to pander a vote, even stoop to drinking whiskey and riding on the back of a pick-up truck. I guess she learned to throw back a few stiff drinks during the Monica Lewinsky days but I find it laughable that she actually has the good ole boys foaming at the mouth at the sight of her hanging off the back of that pickup! I am here in Florida, Tallahassee to be exact and those of us with an education (you know the ones with too much sense to fall for HRC's tactics)know the truth as to why Obama is winning. For HRC and company to continue to lie about the voters here in Florida is really getting to be a bit much, it was a Democrat that presented the bill to move the primary date up, the Republicans just assisted in getting it passed. To try and blame Obama for the mess Florida finds itself in is astonishing to me. HRC is trying to get the vote to stand as is knowing full well that it was tainted election. I know plenty of voters that did not bother to take off work, leave school, or other things to vote since it was not going to count. HRC does not want a revote here in this State because the one thing she has no counter to is the massive ability of the youth to mobilize and unite to stop her. The college students despise HRC and they would truly send her a strong message that this State is tired of the status quo and she is not wanted. To play the race card is nothing for the Clintons, an unstacked deck is no fun for them I am sure.

A mind is a terrible thing to waste, not to mention the time,ink and paper also wasted to write this letter.

J. C. Watts a Black Republican speaks ~ Colleague and Friend of Drevelyn “D” Minor ~
I personally supported and hosted a fundraiser for Mr. Watts at my home in San Francisco the first time he decided to run for a political position in the Republican Party. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The statement below was written by: J. C. Watts a Black Republican and I bet you he has solid information on what he has chosen to share with the public.

J.C. Watts is a rare breed, a black Republican, the first elected from a southern state in over 120 years. Instead of joining the Congressional Black Caucus (obviously primarily Democratic in nature), he was chosen chair of the House Republican Conference (1998). Since retiring from Congress he has headed J.C. Watts Companies, a consultant in business strategies, and is active on several corporate boards. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I must add this; the Republican Party Members (White Men) clearly demonstrated their racist acts toward this young Black Man. He was too young to retire on his on…. ~~~~~~~~~~

Mr. Watts Wrote: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Ed Rendell, the state's Democrat governor and the very effective spokesman for Clinton's campaign there, generously praised Farrakhan and the Nation of Islam 11 years ago. This is an issue because for so many people, Farrakhan is poisonous. It is safe to say his tone makes many voters nervous. ~~~~~~~~~~~~
Rendell, who was then the mayor of Philadelphia , praised Farrakhan and the Nation of Islam's Philadelphia leadership at a rally in 1997. He expressed his "respect for the nation of Islam" and praised local Islam leader Rodney Mohammed for "the intensity of his beliefs, for the decency of his soul, and for the strength of his courage." ~~~~~~~~~~~
Through her relationship with Rendell, Clinton and her team have as close -- or closer -- a tie to Farrakhan as does Obama. ~~~~~~~~~~~
However, it was Obama who got tied to the Farrakhan wagon, and not Clinton. She got a pass. I found it interesting that Rendell was not asked to distance himself from Farrakhan or the Nation of Islam in order to support Clinton . ~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Nor should he have been asked to. Clinton was not asked to distance herself from Rendell for his praising of Farrakhan, and the notion was never raised by the media or anyone else. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
We often read columns, watch the news and listen to debates with our own biased political filter. Republicans and Democrats alike are guilty of this. We usually don't like the comments made by an analyst unless they lean toward our point of view. As is said in politics, there are three sides to every story. ~~~~~~~~~~~~
Your side, my side, and the truth. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In the case of the tangled web between Obama, Clinton and Farrakhan, we didn't get Obama's side or the truth. We got Clinton 's side. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The bottom line is this: Neither Louis Farrakhan or Jeremiah Wright should determine this election, no more than certain endorsements of John McCain should determine the general election. ~~~~~~~~~~
I am more concerned about who can keep America safe from terrorists, who can create opportunity for all, who has the best plan for educating our kids (1.2 million kids drop out of school every year), and who best understands that real change doesn't require just talk, but real, genuine change. ~~~~~~

Hillary Clinton and Farrakhan Positive Relationship ~ it appears in the African American Communities that Louis Farrakhan or Jeremiah Wright are “BACK DOOR SUPPORTERS” of Hillary Clinton. ~~~~~~~
White Americans I pray you will "WAKE UP" and see the games the Clintons are playing with them ~ it's shameful! ~~~~~~~ It’s all about money and control..~~~~~~~
Note: Hillary and Billy Clinton wishes to get back in office "By Any Means Necessary." That makes me nervous! ~~~~~~
Drevelyn “D” Minor is voting Senator Obama! ~~


Post a comment

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In

ESSENCE SISTER SITES

©2007 Essence Communications Inc. All Rights Reserved    Privacy Policy | Terms of Use
MORE TRUSTED SITES FROM TIME INC.